[pve-devel] pve-manager and disk IO monitoring

[Michael Rasmussen]

On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:11:00 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:

> 
> Is there a reasonable explanation for that?
> 
> @mir: can you reproduce those results reliable?
> 
First a comment on the numbers: The tests was made on a production
setup so conditions could vary slightly. Having that in mind I would
qualify scsi-generic and scsi-block to be more or less on par
performance wise.

Given the above and by using scsi-generic loosing the ability to have
realtime numbers for disk IO dos not favor using scsi-generic.

I will run another test now.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
Formatted to fit your screen.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20160930/c9d99d9d/attachment.sig>