[pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster (100nodes), get rid of corosync ?

Alexandre DERUMIER aderumier at odiso.com
Wed Sep 21 01:25:24 CEST 2016

Another question about my first idea (replace corosync),

is is really difficult to replace corosync by something else ?

Sheepdog storage for example, have support for corosync and zookeeper.

----- Mail original -----
De: "datanom.net" <mir at datanom.net>
À: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com>
Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Septembre 2016 01:08:48
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster (100nodes), get rid of corosync ?

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:56:06 +0200 (CEST) 
Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier at odiso.com> wrote: 

> >>vmid are unique with a single cluster, but not within several clusters... 
> yes, that's why I proposed to add some kind of optional prefix to vmid, could be defined in each cluster. 
Instead of a literal prefix you could use a binary prefix instead. A 
binary prefix occupies fewer bytes in pmxcfs meaning fewer bytes to 
exchange between nodes and determine whether a VM is a citizen in this 
cluster or form a foreign cluster is just a matter of a binary and (&). 

Michael Rasmussen 

Get my public GnuPG keys: 
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc 
mir <at> datanom <dot> net 
mir <at> miras <dot> org 
/usr/games/fortune -es says: 
Dry clean only. 

pve-devel mailing list 
pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 

More information about the pve-devel mailing list