[pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster (100nodes), get rid of corosync ?

Michael Rasmussen mir at datanom.net
Wed Sep 21 01:08:48 CEST 2016


On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:56:06 +0200 (CEST)
Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier at odiso.com> wrote:

> >>vmid are unique with a single cluster, but not within several clusters...  
> 
> yes, that's why I proposed to add some kind of optional prefix to vmid, could be defined in each cluster.
> 
Instead of a literal prefix you could use a binary prefix instead. A
binary prefix occupies fewer bytes in pmxcfs meaning fewer bytes to
exchange between nodes and determine whether a VM is a citizen in this
cluster or form a foreign cluster is just a matter of a binary and (&).

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
Dry clean only.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20160921/0d246507/attachment.sig>


More information about the pve-devel mailing list