[PVE-User] database performance: KVM or Physical machine
Philippe Schwarz
phil at schwarz-fr.net
Fri May 17 17:30:33 CEST 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/05/2013 14:45, Muhammad Yousuf Khan a écrit :
> we have good specs server machines on which multiple Windows 2008
> R2 servers are installed what is the recommended approach for
> using MS SQL database. the reason i am asking because i read it on
> internet that people recommended to install database server on
> separate physical machine for better performance.
>
> so is it just a misconception or virtual machines can also give us
> the same processing power?
>
>
Hi,
I'd say that this reccommandation depends on the way a Db server works.
In short : The more IOPS the better !
So avoiding to spend time in web/PHP-Java-Whatever is useful in order
to be more effective in SQL service.
On the same phys machine (different VM) could be (__could be__, it's
just a suggest) a good solution with fast disks, or in a better way,
with SSDs for your VM.
My 2 cts
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlGWTRYACgkQlhqCFkbqHRYKzQCffHv5tqbDz8jN1bgQqrALkXT7
0D4AnjSlmI9aBbCjUfdumizR+mnpCIvV
=napD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the pve-user
mailing list