[PVE-User] SAN recommendation.
Marco Gabriel - inett GmbH
mgabriel at inett.de
Wed Aug 28 12:39:23 CEST 2013
You should avoid using mdadm as device for ZFS. ZFS can do much better than mdraid.
However you can use partitions as a basis for ZFS and form a RAID volume on the partitions.
Marco
Von: pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com [mailto:pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com] Im Auftrag von Muhammad Yousuf Khan
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. August 2013 09:50
An: Michael Rasmussen
Cc: pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
Betreff: Re: [PVE-User] SAN recommendation.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Michael Rasmussen <mir at miras.org <mailto:mir at miras.org> > wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:10:11 -0400
Rob Fantini <rob at fantinibakery.com <mailto:rob at fantinibakery.com> > wrote:
> Ominios looks solid,
>
> Is there a way to set up high availability , using 2 hosts running Ominios?
>
http://www.high-availability.com/omnios-high-availability-cluster/ <http://www.high-availability.com/omnios-high-availability-cluster/>
But it is not free as in free beer.
one more question. as i am trying to study ZFS from googling and youtubing. i have a question like we mdadm in linux can we create RAID partitions for ZFS? for example.if i am using RAIDz1 with 3x500GB HD . means it is giving me (1TB). so for example after few years may be 2 years on out of 3 drives fail and 500 drive is no longer available in market and at that time minimum size i can by is 1TB. so my question can i plug large size drive as RAID with small drives one?
Thanks,
Myk
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E <http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E>
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C <http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C>
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 <http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917>
--------------------------------------------------------------
This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an
actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you?
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user at pve.proxmox.com <mailto:pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user <http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user at pve.proxmox.com <mailto:pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user <http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20130828/b14c6fd6/attachment.htm>
More information about the pve-user
mailing list