[PVE-User] Problem proxmox 2.0 to forward vmbr1 to eth0, eth1, eth2 VM
Flavio Stanchina
flavio.stanchina at ies.it
Mon Mar 26 11:34:44 CEST 2012
maykel at maykel.sytes.net wrote:
> Hi! I have installed successfully proxmox 2.0 in my server. It has four
> network cards: [...]
>
> vmbr1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 3c:4a:92:7c:4d:b9
> inet addr:10.116.10.15 Bcast:10.116.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
>
> vmbr2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:26:55:ea:3d:48
> inet addr:10.116.10.26 Bcast:10.116.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
>
> vmbr3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:26:55:ea:3d:49
> inet addr:10.116.10.27 Bcast:10.116.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
>
> [...]
>
> And now, ping to 10.116.10.26(vmbr2)other physical network card in theory:
>
> root at virtual1:~# tcpdump -i vmbr2 icmp ----->>> Not show anything
>
> But in vmbr1 yes...
Your network configuration doesn't make sense. You have three network
cards on the same subnet and you say the cable is not connected on vmbr2
and vmbr3, so the behavior you see is entirely normal and certainly not
a bug in Proxmox VE. Packets to 10.116.10.26 and .27 will never traverse
the physical network interfaces that own those address if the cables are
not connected, I think that's obvious.
I suggest to test a similar network configuration on two physical
machines before trying it in a virtualized environment with the
additional complexities of bridging and virtual networks.
--
Flavio Stanchina
Informatica e Servizi
Trento - Italy
More information about the pve-user
mailing list