[pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] add is_replicated field to migration check result
Mira Limbeck
m.limbeck at proxmox.com
Thu May 14 11:20:15 CEST 2020
On 5/14/20 11:11 AM, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> On 5/12/20 3:45 PM, Mira Limbeck wrote:
>> For better warnings regarding replicated disks and the ignored target
>> storage, add the 'is_replicated' field to the migration check result.
>> This contains the result of the replication checks. The first one
>> checks if
>> the VM is replicated, and the second one checks if the VM is
>> replicated to
>> the target node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck at proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
>> index fd51bf3..f88ea6d 100644
>> --- a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
>> @@ -3329,7 +3329,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> local_resources => {
>> type => 'array',
>> description => "List local resources e.g. pci, usb"
>> - }
>> + },
>> + is_replicated => {
>> + type => 'boolean',
>> + description => 'Indicates if the VM is replicated to the
>> target node'
>> + },
>> },
>> },
>> code => sub {
>> @@ -3382,6 +3386,14 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> $res->{local_resources} = $local_resources;
>> + my $repl_conf = PVE::ReplicationConfig->new();
>> + if (defined($target)) {
>> + $res->{is_replicated} =
>> ($repl_conf->check_for_existing_jobs($vmid, 1) // 0)
>> + && defined($repl_conf->find_local_replication_job($vmid,
>> $target)) ? 1 : 0;
>
> Nit: the second check should be enough here.
Yes, you're right. The second one is enough as it contains the first one
already.
>
>> + } else {
>> + $res->{is_replicated} = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> return $res;
>>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list