[pve-devel] scsi-hd vs scsi-generic with iSCSI

Dietmar Maurer dietmar at proxmox.com
Thu Oct 10 08:15:37 CEST 2019


also see: https://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2012-August/003347.html

> On 9 October 2019 17:39 Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht at proxmox.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> On 10/8/19 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote:
> > ----- Le 8 Oct 19, à 12:28, Thomas Lamprecht t.lamprecht at proxmox.com a écrit :
> > 
> >>
> >> Thanks for the nice write up and clear reproducer!
> >>
> >> It seems that if we cannot use the same backend for all disks we need to
> >> die when a disk move to a storage backend is request, and that move would
> >> need to change the scsi "backend".
> >> As I'd not like to die it would be better to see if there's still the need
> >> for different backends.
> > 
> > Dying wouldn't be very nice indeed (I need to be able to move disks between NFS and ZFS over iSCSI on a regular basis) 
> > 
> > If scsi-hd was always selected, there would be no issue. I've patched my QemuServer.pm to do that for now.
> > Not sure if scsi-generic/scsi-block has any advantages, but I couldn't measure performance diff in my case. unmap is also passed correctly with scsi-hd. IMHO, unless there are strong values with them (which I'am unaware off, but I couldn't find any documentation about all those backends), we should always use scsi-hd, as it's working with all storage types and allows live disk move from any storage type to any other, including the issue I have specific to ZFS over iSCSI (guest I/O error during live move from ZFS over iSCSI to something else)
> 
> I would actually really like to change this to scsi-hd, but we need to be sure
> it's OK for all possible supported setups..
> 
> So I tried to investigate a bit how it came to the use of scsi-generic, I came
> to a commit[0] from Alexandre (CCd) which adds support for access with libiscsi.
> 
> Maybe he knows why the -generic was used and not the -hd one?
> 
> [0]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=qemu-server.git;a=commitdiff;h=d454d040338a6216c8d3e5cc9623d6223476cb5a
> 
> cheers,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel




More information about the pve-devel mailing list