[pve-devel] perhaps a bug in QemuConfig.pm?

[Michael Rasmussen]

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:12:45 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:

> 
> IMHO, this is simply not suitable for a virtualization storage backend. 
> And I don't want to limit the functionality of our software only because 
> there are some outdated storage boxes around.

Do you mean it is a usual situation that a VM has more than 20 disks
assigned?

> 
> Or what was the suggestion exactly?
> 
The suggestion was the following:
1) A VM or CT will be limited to have a maximum of 20 disks assigned.
2) A VM or CT will be limited to have no more than 4 active snapshots
at a time.
3) One LUN is reserved for snapshot backups of CT's.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
Q:	What do you call a blind, deaf-mute, quadraplegic Virginian?
A:	Trustworthy.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20170606/6c98aa15/attachment.sig>