[pve-devel] perhaps a bug in QemuConfig.pm?
Dietmar Maurer
dietmar at proxmox.com
Tue Jun 6 17:12:45 CEST 2017
> I was referring to the extra "snapshot" of the state which for remote
> storage means the requirements for an extra LUN which is limiting things
> when number of LUN's are sparse as it is with FreeNAS (Max 25 LUN's for
> each VM).
IMHO, this is simply not suitable for a virtualization storage backend.
And I don't want to limit the functionality of our software only because
there are some outdated storage boxes around.
Or what was the suggestion exactly?
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list