[pve-devel] qemu2.7: cpu hotplug && hot-unplug v1
Alexandre DERUMIER
aderumier at odiso.com
Mon Sep 12 18:56:16 CEST 2016
>>No idea (and no docs/examples available?)
I think using aiocontext is enough.
(But I think that iothread still need to be enable on block device to use a different aiocontext than the main qemu context)
look at the simple qmp_block_resize
void qmp_block_resize(bool has_device, const char *device,
bool has_node_name, const char *node_name,
int64_t size, Error **errp)
{
Error *local_err = NULL;
BlockDriverState *bs;
AioContext *aio_context;
int ret;
bs = bdrv_lookup_bs(has_device ? device : NULL,
has_node_name ? node_name : NULL,
&local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
if (!bdrv_is_first_non_filter(bs)) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_FEATURE_DISABLED, "resize");
goto out;
}
/* complete all in-flight operations before resizing the device */
bdrv_drain_all();
if (size < 0) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE, "size", "a >0 size");
goto out;
}
if (bdrv_op_is_blocked(bs, BLOCK_OP_TYPE_RESIZE, NULL)) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_DEVICE_IN_USE, device);
goto out;
}
/* complete all in-flight operations before resizing the device */
bdrv_drain_all();
ret = bdrv_truncate(bs, size);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
break;
case -ENOMEDIUM:
error_setg(errp, QERR_DEVICE_HAS_NO_MEDIUM, device);
break;
case -ENOTSUP:
error_setg(errp, QERR_UNSUPPORTED);
break;
case -EACCES:
error_setg(errp, "Device '%s' is read only", device);
break;
case -EBUSY:
error_setg(errp, QERR_DEVICE_IN_USE, device);
break;
default:
error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Could not resize");
break;
}
out:
aio_context_release(aio_context);
}
----- Mail original -----
De: "dietmar" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
À: "aderumier" <aderumier at odiso.com>
Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com>
Envoyé: Lundi 12 Septembre 2016 17:36:45
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] qemu2.7: cpu hotplug && hot-unplug v1
> >>I also wonder if it would make sense to run the backup code
> >>inside its own thread? I guess this would make the code simpler.
>
> Yes. It can have big advantage.
>
> If it share the main qemu thread, this can make slowdown or qemu hang is
> backup process is hanging.
>
> Not sure how it's implemented in qemu drive_backup ?
No idea (and no docs/examples available?)
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list