[pve-devel] Qemu-img thin provision

Gilberto Nunes gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 26 15:40:55 CEST 2015


Perhaps your diff, indeed, work because after apply it I forgot to restart
the services mentioned in previous mail... I will try it again...

2015-09-26 10:25 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com>:

> Well.... I am deep sorry for my misuse of list terms or whatever
> By the way, the diff doesn't work Dietmar...
> Instead, I directly edit Plugin.pm and change preallocate=metadata to
> preallocate=off.
>
> After restart pvedaemon, pve-manager and pvestatd, everything works fine...
>
> Thanks for the directions...
>
> 2015-09-26 10:17 GMT-03:00 Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> > On September 26, 2015 at 2:56 PM Michael Rasmussen <mir at datanom.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:20:20 +0200 (CEST)
>> > Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > first, please do not send private mail. (use the mailing list instead)
>> > >
>> > This is how your list server is configured. Your list server also adds
>> > the header: Reply-To: original sender <original at sender.bar>
>> >
>> > Which means that a great many MUA's will mail to original sender only
>> > when user hits 'Reply'.
>>
>> AFAIK our list server does not touch the reply-to attribute. This is
>> set by the poster instead:
>>
>> Mailman docs says:
>> ------------------------
>> This option controls what Mailman does to the Reply-To: header in messages
>> flowing through this mailing list. When set to Poster, no Reply-To:
>> header is
>> added by Mailman, although if one is present in the original message, it
>> is not
>> stripped. Setting this value to either This list or Explicit address
>> causes
>> Mailman to insert a specific Reply-To: header in all messages, overriding
>> the
>> header in the original message if necessary (Explicit address inserts the
>> value
>> of reply_to_address).
>>
>> There are many reasons not to introduce or override the Reply-To: header.
>> One is
>> that some posters depend on their own Reply-To: settings to convey their
>> valid
>> return address. Another is that modifying Reply-To: makes it much more
>> difficult
>> to send private replies. See `Reply-To' Munging Considered Harmful for a
>> general
>> discussion of this issue. See Reply-To Munging Considered Useful for a
>> dissenting opinion.
>> ----------------------------
>>
>>
>> But if someone starts a discussion on pve-devel, he should continue to
>> send mail
>> there
>> instead of switching to private only mails.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-devel mailing list
>> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Gilberto Ferreira
> +55 (47) 9676-7530
> Skype: gilberto.nunes36
>
>


-- 

Gilberto Ferreira
+55 (47) 9676-7530
Skype: gilberto.nunes36
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20150926/4a33e84f/attachment.html>


More information about the pve-devel mailing list