[pve-devel] criu for lxc news on criu.org
Daniel Hunsaker
danhunsaker at gmail.com
Sun Mar 29 18:26:32 CEST 2015
If RedHat isn't going to support the technologies we need, and OpenVZ is
evaporating anyway, maybe we should consider a different kernel? One where
KVM and LXC, at least, will be fully supported? It seems that creating our
own team to manage backporting kernel patches ourselves would be difficult
at best, and consume a lot of time in dev and test cycles, so finding a
different group already doing those things the way we need them done would
be preferred.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015, 10:10 Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:
> > > Yes - I started to remove the OpenVZ code from the jessie branch for
> that
> > > reason
> > > now.
> > > LXC seems to slowly develop - the bad news is that RH just dropped
> support
> > > for
> > > it :-/
> > > (at least the announced that in a press release).
> > >
> > > Any ideas are highly appreciated ...
> > If it needs to be fully Redhat supported docker seems the only option.
>
> Docker is best run inside a VM. It makes no sense to run such limited
> containers
> on the host.
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20150329/c1245b2d/attachment.htm>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list