[pve-devel] lxc 1.1 : qcow2 support ?

Michael Rasmussen mir at datanom.net
Sun Apr 26 20:22:44 CEST 2015


On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 19:14:12 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:

> 
> My current thinking is that we should only use native storage feature, i.e.
> simply no snapshots for NFS.
> 
> For btrfs, zfs, lvm (thin), sheepdog, ceph, drbd we can use native snapshots.
> Those storage types also provides disk quotas.
> 
> We can use a loop mount to provide disk quota for NFS, ext3, ext4, xfs.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
I think this is a reasonable decision. I users wants to be able to
make snapshots the should choose a proper storage and file system.
Implementing self-constructed hacks is just a waiting logical bomb. 

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
For adult education nothing beats children.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20150426/f33cdb68/attachment.sig>


More information about the pve-devel mailing list