[pve-devel] pvefw: using ctmark to associacte connections to VMs
Daniel Hunsaker
danhunsaker at gmail.com
Sun Mar 2 09:47:51 CET 2014
Another reason is that a user might have more VMs on their system than our
default will allow. Granted, they'd need a really powerful server to do
that, and would probably also know what to tweak to adapt, but a dynamic
value allows us to allocate the resources we need instead of just an
arbitrary/theoretical ceiling (and it saves us needing to adjust the
default periodically as servers get more powerful in future years).
On Mar 1, 2014 6:16 AM, "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:
> > >>or dynamic value with number of vms ?)
> >
> > Maybe, allowing something like 32000 connections by vm, (350byte of
> > memory by connection, around 10mb) and net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_max =
> > numberofvms x 32000.
>
> What is the advantage of using dynamic value? You want to save RAM?
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20140302/26a8162c/attachment.htm>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list