[pve-devel] OpenVZ for Upstream

[Alexandre DERUMIER]

>>I believe that LXC will be added to the Proxmox virtualization options when it is mature and stable enough to do so without interfering with OpenVZ or any of the other moving parts that make Proxmox go.  (And I'm >>sure I'll be corrected on that if I'm wrong. :-) )

live migration is not available in lxc currently
But they are looking for using http://criu.org/Main_Page
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2DkDoz-Oh0

I think that disk quota is missing too (I'm not sur about this)



----- Mail original ----- 

De: "Daniel Hunsaker" <danhunsaker at gmail.com> 
À: "Kamil Trzciński" <ayufan at ayufan.eu> 
Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
Envoyé: Mardi 29 Avril 2014 11:45:42 
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] OpenVZ for Upstream 


Three things I'd like to point out here. The 2.6.32 is patched by RedHat with much of the later (upstream) features of and improvements to the 3.x kernel. Second, the cgroup stuff came from OpenVZ almost exclusively anyway - LXC is just a reimplementation. And third, the OpenVZ team have realized that sticking with 2.6.32 as RedHat has done in their current stable (7 should be out soon, as I understand it, and will then become the current stable) is not the best decision they've made, and efforts have been underway for some time now to bring OpenVZ into the 3.x line. Indeed, the lead Proxmox devs have been working with the 3.10 kernel, prepping it for a near-future release, for several months now. So we will be seeing this soon. 
That said, this is a good proof of concept to see. Hopefully the maintainers of vzctl are open to the patches you've made and will be willing to merge them, though I wouldn't be surprised if there were some tweaks to the specifics. I believe that LXC will be added to the Proxmox virtualization options when it is mature and stable enough to do so without interfering with OpenVZ or any of the other moving parts that make Proxmox go. (And I'm sure I'll be corrected on that if I'm wrong. :-) ) 
In short, much of this is coming, but thanks for sharing a glimpse at what it might look like for today. 
On Apr 29, 2014 2:12 AM, "Kamil Trzciński" < ayufan at ayufan.eu > wrote: 


As proof of concept written in my broken english: 
http://ayufan.eu/projects/proxmox-for-upstream/ 

Kamil Trzciński 
_______________________________________________ 
pve-devel mailing list 
pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 



_______________________________________________ 
pve-devel mailing list 
pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel