[pve-devel] successfull migration but failed resume

Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG s.priebe at profihost.ag
Sat Feb 23 09:29:00 CET 2013


But isn't it a simple rename right now? Under which circumstances this can fail?

Am 23.02.2013 um 08:05 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier at odiso.com>:

>>> yes
> 
> Well, No really,
> 
> if the migration fail, the target vm process is always killed, so it's not a problem.
> 
> The problem is when we  have the target vm correctly migrated, but the vm config file that is keep on first node.(timeframe windows is very short,maybe 1s)
> In this case,you have a "phantom" kvm process on target, as user don't see the vm on target node, and user can start again the vm on first node, and boom.
> 
> 
> 
> It was really a problem last year, If I remember the vm config file was moved at the begin of the migration, and we killed the sourcevm when migration failed. 
> But killing the sourcevm didn't always working,so we had a "phantom" process on sourcevm and user can start again the vm on target vm and boom.
> 
> 
> So this is why we start in paused. But the risk currently is in the little timeframe at the end of the migration, when we need to move the config file.
> 
> Ideas are welcome to improve this  ;)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original ----- 
> 
> De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com> 
> À: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe at profihost.ag> 
> Cc: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>, pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
> Envoyé: Vendredi 22 Février 2013 20:04:37 
> Objet: RE: [pve-devel] successfull migration but failed resume 
> 
>> Mhm but in cases like Mine we have no running vm on both sides. So are you 
>> sure that when migrating there could be a reason to have two vms running?
> 
> yes 



More information about the pve-devel mailing list