[pve-devel] pve-enterprise repository
Michael Rasmussen
mir at datanom.net
Thu Aug 22 08:59:07 CEST 2013
Hi Dietmar,
Not to add to the storm but it light of the reaction on the forum I am most certain have the contents of this answer been posted on the forum everybody would have been happy. Noone can argue against what you express here and then value added by enterprise rep will be worth at least a community subscribtion. It was for me at least.
Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:
>> I'm trying to understand the new pve-enterprise repository.
>>
>> is it something like :
>>
>> pve-enterprise = old stable pve repo
>> pve-no-subscription = old pvetest repo
>
>No, we will be more careful when we update pve-no-subscription (unlike
>pvetest, which was my personal playground).
>
>The current release policy is:
>
>1.) test packages internally in our test labs
>2.) also wait for feedback from external developers
>3.) upload to pve-no-subscription (history shows that packages are
>quite stable at this stage)
>4.) move packages from pve-no-subscription to pve-enterprise after 2
>weeks if everything works as expected.
>
>So basically the new pve-enterprise repository is expected to have less
>bugs than the previous pve repository.
>
>We try to provide additional value by improving the quality. There are
>no plans to lower the
>quality of any repository.
>
>- Dietmar
>
>_______________________________________________
>pve-devel mailing list
>pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
>http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>!DSPAM:5215aca2156008231310047!
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20130822/0a88b85c/attachment.htm>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list