[pve-devel] FVD
    Alexandre DERUMIER 
    aderumier at odiso.com
       
    Sat Sep  8 08:49:59 CEST 2012
    
    
  
>>Yes, but qcow3 is also non-existent? Or do they simply improve qcow2 now? 
yes,qcow3 should be qcow2 V3.  I don't think they want to rewrote from strach a new format, only try to improve current.
It could be fine to bench FVD  vs current qcow2 (with metadata preallocation, and the new lazycount option)
----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com> 
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com> 
Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
Envoyé: Vendredi 7 Septembre 2012 18:07:50 
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] FVD 
> It was never in qemu upstream. 
> 
> qemu dev prefer to not maintain to much disk format . (FVD seem to be great 
> on the paper) 
I just wrote a mail to the developer - maybe I will get a reply. 
> They prefer to take idea from FVD and push them in the (futur) qcow2 v3 
Yes, but qcow3 is also non-existent? Or do they simply improve qcow2 now? 
    
    
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list