aderumier at odiso.com
Sat Sep 8 08:49:59 CEST 2012
>>Yes, but qcow3 is also non-existent? Or do they simply improve qcow2 now?
yes,qcow3 should be qcow2 V3. I don't think they want to rewrote from strach a new format, only try to improve current.
It could be fine to bench FVD vs current qcow2 (with metadata preallocation, and the new lazycount option)
----- Mail original -----
De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 7 Septembre 2012 18:07:50
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] FVD
> It was never in qemu upstream.
> qemu dev prefer to not maintain to much disk format . (FVD seem to be great
> on the paper)
I just wrote a mail to the developer - maybe I will get a reply.
> They prefer to take idea from FVD and push them in the (futur) qcow2 v3
Yes, but qcow3 is also non-existent? Or do they simply improve qcow2 now?
More information about the pve-devel