[pve-devel] FVD

Alexandre DERUMIER aderumier at odiso.com
Sat Sep 8 08:49:59 CEST 2012


>>Yes, but qcow3 is also non-existent? Or do they simply improve qcow2 now? 

yes,qcow3 should be qcow2 V3.  I don't think they want to rewrote from strach a new format, only try to improve current.

It could be fine to bench FVD  vs current qcow2 (with metadata preallocation, and the new lazycount option)

----- Mail original ----- 

De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com> 
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com> 
Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
Envoyé: Vendredi 7 Septembre 2012 18:07:50 
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] FVD 

> It was never in qemu upstream. 
> 
> qemu dev prefer to not maintain to much disk format . (FVD seem to be great 
> on the paper) 

I just wrote a mail to the developer - maybe I will get a reply. 

> They prefer to take idea from FVD and push them in the (futur) qcow2 v3 

Yes, but qcow3 is also non-existent? Or do they simply improve qcow2 now? 


More information about the pve-devel mailing list