[pve-devel] Fw: Storage migration

[Michael Rasmussen]

On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:47:59 -0500
eric <eric at netwalk.com> wrote:

> If doing live block migration over 10g or faster the performance will be just fine for nearly all use cases.
> It would be useable over 1g if the vm is not doing lots of io.
> 
> Sometimes a little bit of a performance hit is better than having downtime. 
> 
> Having the option allows flexibility to solve problems that might not be obvious to us today.
> 
I agree to all of these usecases. My plan is to start with the "easy"
part - offline migration, since online migration is much more
complicated. My goal is however, to implement online migration sometime
in the future. Providing offline migration will be a god starting point.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20121118/a33bd9a8/attachment.sig>