[PVE-User] Experimenting with bond on a non-LACP switch...
Wolf Noble
wolf at wolfspyre.com
Wed May 25 04:11:09 CEST 2022
I was condensing several (i emit traffic on one interface but listen on all bond members) into ‘active-passive’
this:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBonding
does a better job explaining the different modes…
hope that helps?
🤡 ( sorry for the confusion )
W
[= The contents of this message have been written, read, processed, erased, sorted, sniffed, compressed, rewritten, misspelled, overcompensated, lost, found, and most importantly delivered entirely with recycled electrons =]
> On May 24, 2022, at 16:40, Marco Gaiarin <gaio at lilliput.linux.it> wrote:
>
> Mandi! Laurent Dumont
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>> There is this old thread with a similar discussion :
>> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cluster-lacp.90668/
>
> Apart that i have other clusters where corosync run against LACP bonds
> without roubles, i've a little simpler question:
>
>>> If you intend to run your cluster network on the bonding
>>> interfaces, then you have to use active-passive mode on the bonding
>>> interfaces, other modes are unsupported.
>
> What is 'active-passive'?! Is the same of 'active-backup'? seems a
> terminology inconsistency to me...
>
> --
> Se non trovi nessuno vuol dire che siamo scappati alle sei-shell (bash,
> tcsh,csh...) (Possi)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
More information about the pve-user
mailing list