[PVE-User] ceph

Eneko Lacunza elacunza at binovo.es
Mon Sep 13 13:44:22 CEST 2021


Hi Leandro,


El 13/9/21 a las 13:32, Leandro Roggerone escribió:
> hi guys , your responses were very useful.
> Lets suppose  I have my 3 nodes running and forming a cluster.
> Please confirm:
> a -Can I add the ceph storage at any time ?
Yes
> b- All nodes should be running the same pve version ?
Generally speaking this is advisable. What versions do you have right now?
> c- All nodes should have 1 or more non used storages with no hardware raid
> to be included in the ceph ?
It is advisable to have OSDs in at least 3 nodes yes (some may say 4 is 
better).

> Those storages (c) should be exactly same in capacity , speed , and so ...
> ?
Roughly speaking, Ceph will perform as well as the worst disk configured 
for Ceph. If you plan to use SSD disks, use Enteprise SSD disk, not 
consumer/client SSDs.

> What can goes wrong if dont have 10 but 1 gbps ports ?

Latency and overall performance of Ceph storage will be worse/slower. If 
you plan using 1G, consider setting up separate "cluster" ports for Ceph 
(1G for VM traffic, 1G for ceph public, 1G for ceph cluster/private)

We have clusters with both 10G and 1G (3x1G) networks. All of them work 
well but 10G network is quite noticeable, specially with SSD disks.

Cheers

> Regards.
> Leandro
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Libre
> de virus. www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> El mié, 8 sept 2021 a las 19:21, ic (<lists at benappy.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>>> On 8 Sep 2021, at 14:46, Leandro Roggerone <leandro at tecnetmza.com.ar>
>> wrote:
>>> I would like to know the goods that a ceph storage can bring to my
>> existing
>>> cluster.
>>> What is an easy / recommended way to implement it ?
>>> Wich hardware should I consider to use ?
>> First, HW.
>>
>> Get two Cisco Nexus 3064PQ (they typically go for $600-700 for 48 10G
>> ports) and two Intel X520-DA2 per server.
>>
>> Hook up each port of the Intel cards to each of the Nexuses, getting a
>> full redundancy between network cards and switches.
>>
>> Add 4x40G DAC cables between the switches, setup 2 as VPC peer-links, 2 as
>> a simple L2 trunk (can provide more details as why if needed).
>>
>> Use ports 0 from both NICs for ceph, ports 1 for VM traffic. This way you
>> get 2x10 Gbps for Ceph only and 2x10 Gbps for everything else, and if you
>> loose one card or one switch, you still have 10 Gbps for each.
>>
>> The benefits? With default configuration, your data lives in 3 places.
>> Also, scale out. You know the expensive stuff, hyperconverged servers
>> (nutanix and such) ? You get that with this.
>>
>> The performance is wild, just moved my customers from a proxmox cluster
>> backed by a TrueNAS server (full flash, 4x10Gbps) to a 3 node cluster of
>> AMD EPYC nodes with Ceph on local SATA SSDs and the VMs started flying.
>>
>> Keep your old storage infrastructure, whatever that is, for backups with
>> PBS.
>>
>> YMMV
>>
>> Regards, ic
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-user mailing list
>> pve-user at lists.proxmox.com
>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Eneko Lacunza
Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico
Binovo IT Human Project

Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es
Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun

https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO
https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/




More information about the pve-user mailing list