[PVE-User] PVE and Cisco Catalyst switched...

Naumann, Thomas thomas.naumann at ovgu.de
Thu Jul 15 13:23:10 CEST 2021


Hi,

LACP is not a "must have", you need it if you want to have physical HA.
If there is only one physical interface on proxmox node then you can
configure one switchport on cisco side as acces/trunk-port - for
example:

proxmox side:

auto vmbrxxx
iface vmbrxxx inet static
        address xxx
        gateway xxx
        bridge_ports xxx
        bridge_stp on
        bridge_fd 3

cisco side:

interface GigabitEthernetxxx
 description xxx
 switchport
 switchport access vlan xxx
 switchport mode access
 no vtp
 spanning-tree portfast edge
 spanning-tree guard root

best regards
-- 
Thomas Naumann

Abteilung Netze und Kommunikation
Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg
Universitätsrechenzentrum
Universitätsplatz 2
39106 Magdeburg

fon: +49 391 67-58563
email: thomas.naumann at ovgu.de

On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 12:29 +0200, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Daniel via pve-user
>   In chel di` si favelave...
> 
> > check the Cisco log "sh logg" when the LED stays orange it could be
> > an STP problem.
> 
> OK. I will try next week.
> 
> 
> > Why you didn’t configure it as a port-channel interface? (bond on
> > Linux)
> 
> ...because i have only one NIC. ;-)
> 
> You (and Thomas, too, thanks!) are meaning that i need anyway to
> create
> an LACP bond with only one member to talk to an LACP cisco trunk?
> 
> With HP (and Ubiquity, also) it is not needed!
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 


More information about the pve-user mailing list