[PVE-User] Feedback on 4.x to 5.x upgrade documentation

Mark Schouten mark at tuxis.nl
Tue Jan 30 11:09:13 CET 2018


On dinsdag 30 januari 2018 08:29:12 CET Fabian Gr├╝nbichler wrote:
> could you provide some details nevertheless? the following might be
> interesting:
> 
> - VM config of an affected guest
> - storage config
> - task log of a failed migration
> - syslog/journal on both source and target node around the time of the
>   same failed migration
> 
> did all VMs with disks mapped via KRBD fail to migrate, or just some?

Sent this info off-list.

I tried a few, that failed. And then stopped trying. So I'm not sure.

-- 
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten  | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076  | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | info at tuxis.nl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20180130/9d327ddd/attachment.sig>


More information about the pve-user mailing list