[PVE-User] pvecm e 1 not working anymore

Jean-Laurent Ivars jl.ivars at ipgenius.fr
Fri Mar 18 12:36:28 CET 2016


You can let go it’s ok, I revert the conf file from my other node, I restarted the corosync service from the web interface and the folder is back.

As you’re saying pvecm expected 1 is working despite what pvecm status says because both the hosts are online, I just made test (temporary deactivate cluster interface on the other node)

and voilà :

root at roubaix /etc/pve # pvecm status
Quorum information
------------------
Date:             Fri Mar 18 12:32:44 2016
Quorum provider:  corosync_votequorum
Nodes:            1
Node ID:          0x00000001
Ring ID:          1504
Quorate:          No

Votequorum information
----------------------
Expected votes:   2
Highest expected: 2
Total votes:      1
Quorum:           2 Activity blocked
Flags:            

Membership information
----------------------
    Nodeid      Votes Name
0x00000001          1 10.10.10.2 (local)
root at roubaix /etc/pve # pvecm expected 1
root at roubaix /etc/pve # pvecm status
Quorum information
------------------
Date:             Fri Mar 18 12:33:00 2016
Quorum provider:  corosync_votequorum
Nodes:            1
Node ID:          0x00000001
Ring ID:          1504
Quorate:          Yes

Votequorum information
----------------------
Expected votes:   1
Highest expected: 1
Total votes:      1
Quorum:           1  
Flags:            Quorate 

Membership information
----------------------
    Nodeid      Votes Name
0x00000001          1 10.10.10.2 (local)
root at roubaix /etc/pve #  

Thank you

	
Jean-Laurent Ivars 
Responsable Technique | Technical Manager
22, rue Robert - 13007 Marseille 
Tel: 09 84 56 64 30 - Mobile: 06.52.60.86.47 
Linkedin <http://fr.linkedin.com/in/jlivars/>   |  Viadeo <http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/jean-laurent.ivars>   |  www.ipgenius.fr <https://www.ipgenius.fr/>
> Le 18 mars 2016 à 12:19, Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> a écrit :
> 
> 
> 
>> On March 18, 2016 at 12:06 PM Jean-Laurent Ivars <jl.ivars at ipgenius.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> better and better ! i tried the following option :
>> 
>> quorum {
>>  provider: corosync_votequorum
>>  expected_votes: 1
>> }
> 
> You really should not set such (dangerous) options unless
> you understand what you are doing ...
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20160318/4833a400/attachment-0015.html>


More information about the pve-user mailing list