[PVE-User] vm's disk io lower with local highspeed disk?
haoyun
haoyun-kgq at 163.com
Fri Jun 17 09:06:45 CEST 2016
First of all,thank you for answering.
the result is : it is not vm's problem,it is raid card problem,raid card without cache.
I test again ,the data as below:
dd if=/dev/zero of=dd.img bs=1M count=2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
use single thread:
/root/fio -filename=/mnt/dd.img -direct=1 -iodepth 1 -thread -rw=randwrite -ioengine=psync -bs=16k -size=1G -numjobs=1 -runtime=60 -group_reporting -name=mytest
R330(H330 0MB-cache,SAS 10K 600G * 6, Raid-10) : bw=3028.7KB/s, iops=189
NX3200 (H710 Mini 512MB-cache,SAS 7.2K 4T * 10,Raid-5) : bw=14555KB/s, iops=909
MD3200i (2GB-cache,SAS 15K 600G * 12 ,Raid-5) : bw=24120KB/s, iops=1507
R710 (PERC 6/i Integrated RAID Controller 256MB-cache,SAS 15K 600G * 2, Raid-1) : bw=16183KB/s, iops=1011
R410 (SAS 6/iR Integrated Controller 0MB-cache,SAS 15K 300G * 2,Raid-1) : bw=3397.6KB/s, iops=212
At 2016-06-15 12:22:35, "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com> wrote:
>raid10 is physical host's Raid-10 with 6 disks(SAS 10k 600G)
>
>
>>>local-highspeed is LogicalVolume on Raid-10
>
>lvm volume ? classic lvm or thin lvm ?
>
>
>>>raid10 is physical host's Raid-10 with 6 disks(SAS 10k 600G)
>>>"do you have cache on your raid controller ?" I don't know what's means?
>
>Well, generally (for hdd mainly), hardware raid controller have memory to handle writes fast, then flush them to disk.
>what is your model ?
>
>
>
>>>fio command is : ./fio -filename=/dev/vda -direct=1 -iodepth 1 -thread -rw=randwrite -ioengine=psync -bs=16k -size=4G -numjobs=30 -runtime=100 -group_reporting -name=mytest
>
>So you are doing sync write,
>that mean that it should bypass all caches (including raid controller cache, disk cache) to be sure that data are correctly written to the disk platters.
>
>I'm surprised than you can reach iops=1344 with 6 SAS 10K in raid10. (should be 250 iops by disk , x3 because of raid10, so around 750iops).
>
>
>Now, some raid hardware controller, can handle the sync writes, without transmit them to disk platter (They need to have a batery, or persistent memory).
>Could explain why you have better performance with your san.
>
>
>can you do fio benchmark with ioengin : libaio , and increase iodepth to 32
>
>./fio -filename=/dev/vda -direct=1 -iodepth 32 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaiO -bs=16k -size=4G -numjobs=30 -runtime=100 -group_reporting -name=mytest
>
>
>then compare with --sync=1 option
>
>./fio -filename=/dev/vda -direct=1 -iodepth 32 -thread -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaiO -bs=16k -size=4G -numjobs=30 -runtime=100 -group_reporting -name=mytest
>
>----- Mail original -----
>De: "haoyun" <haoyun-kgq at 163.com>
>À: "proxmoxve" <pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
>Envoyé: Mercredi 15 Juin 2016 03:51:03
>Objet: Re: [PVE-User] vm's disk io lower with local highspeed disk?
>
>fio command is : ./fio -filename=/dev/vda -direct=1 -iodepth 1 -thread -rw=randwrite -ioengine=psync -bs=16k -size=4G -numjobs=30 -runtime=100 -group_reporting -name=mytest
>
>
>vmconfig:
>balloon: 1024
>bootdisk: virtio2
>cores: 2
>ide2: none,media=cdrom
>memory: 4096
>name: tt
>net0: bridge=vmbr0,e1000=66:37:31:32:34:37
>numa: 0
>ostype: l26
>smbios1: uuid=ce775a6f-6652-43c4-aa92-69ffd3d20013
>sockets: 1
>virtio0: local-highspeed:vm-255-disk-2,size=60G
>virtio2: local-highspeed:vm-255-disk-1,size=8G
>
>
>raid10 is physical host's Raid-10 with 6 disks(SAS 10k 600G)
>
>
>local-highspeed is LogicalVolume on Raid-10
>
>"do you have cache on your raid controller ?" I don't know what's means?
>
>
>
>At 2016-06-14 17:59:17, "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com> wrote:
>>>>Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
>>>>vda 0.00 71.00 8.00 226.00 64.00 2368.00 10.39 1.37 5.85 4.24 99.10
>>>>but I test disk random write is better with fio tools,
>>>>bw=21518KB/s iops=1344
>>
>>
>>do you have cache on your raid controller ?
>>
>>can you send the fio job config?
>>
>>can you send vmconfig ?
>>
>>what is the local raid10 filesystem ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Mail original -----
>>De: "haoyun" <haoyun-kgq at 163.com>
>>À: "proxmoxve" <pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
>>Envoyé: Mardi 14 Juin 2016 07:53:29
>>Objet: [PVE-User] vm's disk io lower with local highspeed disk?
>>
>>hello everyone~
>>
>>
>>I have a problem,
>>I have a new host is Dell R330,
>>run pve4.2 os
>>disk with 2 raid,one is raid1,another is raid10(sas 10k 600G * 6)
>>raid1 as system disk,raid10 as vm images
>>my mysql slave run on this vm with raid10 local disk(lvm).
>>the question is this vm's disk io is very slow,
>>that's why?
>>Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
>>vda 0.00 71.00 8.00 226.00 64.00 2368.00 10.39 1.37 5.85 4.24 99.10
>>but I test disk random write is better with fio tools,
>>bw=21518KB/s iops=1344
>>same vm,I use iscsi remote storage better than it,
>>Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
>>vda 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 24.00 8.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.10
>>that's why?
>>who can help me?
>>What information is needed?please tell me?
>>thanks!
>>_______________________________________________
>>pve-user mailing list
>>pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>>http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>_______________________________________________
>>pve-user mailing list
>>pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>>http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>_______________________________________________
>pve-user mailing list
>pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>_______________________________________________
>pve-user mailing list
>pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
More information about the pve-user
mailing list