[PVE-User] ARP issue between lxc containers on PX 4.2

Alwin Antreich sysadmin-pve at cognitec.com
Sat Jul 9 12:33:04 CEST 2016


Guillaume,

On 07/09/2016 12:10 PM, Guillaume wrote:
> Of course, here they are :
> 
> * Proxmox :
> 
> ~# cat /etc/network/interfaces
> 
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
> 
> iface eth0 inet manual
> 
> iface eth1 inet manual
> 
> auto vmbr1
> iface vmbr1 inet manual
>         bridge_ports dummy0
>         bridge_stp off
>         bridge_fd 0
>         post-up /etc/pve/kvm-networking.sh
> 
> auto vmbr0
> iface vmbr0 inet static
>         address  164.132.161.137
>         netmask  255.255.255.0
>         gateway  164.132.161.254
>         broadcast  164.132.161.255
>         bridge_ports eth0
>         bridge_stp off
>         bridge_fd 0
>         network 164.132.161.0
>         post-up /sbin/ip route add to 51.254.231.80/28 dev vmbr0
>         post-up /sbin/ip route add to default via 51.254.231.94 dev vmbr0 table 5
>         post-up /sbin/ip rule add from 51.254.231.80/28 table 5
>         pre-down /sbin/ip rule del from 51.254.231.80/28 table 5
>         pre-down /sbin/ip route del to default via 51.254.231.94 dev vmbr0 table 5
>         pre-down /sbin/ip route del to 51.254.231.80/28 dev vmbr0
> 
> iface vmbr0 inet6 static
>         address  2001:41d0:1008:1c89::1
>         netmask  64
>         gateway  2001:41d0:1008:1cff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>         post-up /sbin/ip -f inet6 route add 2001:41d0:1008:1cff:ff:ff:ff:ff dev vmbr0
>         post-up /sbin/ip -f inet6 route add default via 2001:41d0:1008:1cff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>         pre-down /sbin/ip -f inet6 route del default via 2001:41d0:1008:1cff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>         pre-down /sbin/ip -f inet6 route del 2001:41d0:1008:1cff:ff:ff:ff:ff dev vmbr0
> 
> auto vmbr2
> iface vmbr2 inet static
>         address  192.168.30.3
>         netmask  255.255.255.0
>         broadcast  192.168.30.255
>         bridge_ports eth1
>         bridge_stp off
>         bridge_fd 0
>         network 192.168.30.0

What is your intention with the post-up? And the config resides under vmbr2 but you bind the route to vmbr0, is it
supposed to be like this?

>         post-up /sbin/ip route add to 224.0.0.0/4 dev vmbr0     # pour forcer le multicast
> 
> ~# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> default         164.132.161.254 0.0.0.0         UG    0 0        0 vmbr0
> 51.254.231.80   *               255.255.255.240 U     0 0        0 vmbr0
> 164.132.161.0   *               255.255.255.0   U     0 0        0 vmbr0
> 192.168.30.0    *               255.255.255.0   U     0 0        0 vmbr2
> 224.0.0.0       *               240.0.0.0       U     0 0        0 vmbr0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> * LXC 1 :
> 
> ~# cat /etc/network/interfaces
> # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
> # Include files from /etc/network/interfaces.d:
> source-directory /etc/network/interfaces.d
> 
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
>         address 51.254.231.80
>         netmask 255.255.255.240
>         gateway 51.254.231.94
>         network 51.254.231.80
>         post-up /sbin/ip route add 164.132.161.137 dev eth0
>         post-up /sbin/ip route add to default via 164.132.161.137
>         pre-down /sbin/ip route del to default via 164.132.161.137
>         pre-down /sbin/ip route del 164.132.161.137 dev eth0
> 
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
>         address 192.168.30.101
>         netmask 255.255.255.0
> 
> ~# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination      Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> default          51.254.231.94   0.0.0.0         UG    0 0        0 eth0
> 51.254.231.80    *               255.255.255.240 U     0 0        0 eth0
> 164.132.161.137  *               255.255.255.255 UH    0 0        0 eth0
> 192.168.30.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0 0        0 eth1
> 
> 
> 
> 
> * LXC 2 :
> 
> ~# cat /etc/network/interfaces
> # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
> # Include files from /etc/network/interfaces.d:
> source-directory /etc/network/interfaces.d
> 
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
>         address 51.254.231.81
>         netmask 255.255.255.240
>         gateway 51.254.231.94
>         network 51.254.231.80
>         post-up /sbin/ip route add 164.132.161.137 dev eth0
>         post-up /sbin/ip route add to default via 164.132.161.137
>         pre-down /sbin/ip route del to default via 164.132.161.137
>         pre-down /sbin/ip route del 164.132.161.137 dev eth0
> 
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
>         address 192.168.30.102
>         netmask 255.255.255.0
> 
> ~# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination      Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> default          51.254.231.94   0.0.0.0         UG    0 0        0 eth0
> 51.254.231.80    *               255.255.255.240 U     0 0        0 eth0
> 164.132.161.137  *               255.255.255.255 UH    0 0        0 eth0
> 192.168.30.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0 0        0 eth1

And the LXC container are bound to vmbr2?

> 
> 
> Le 09/07/2016 à 11:36, Alwin Antreich a écrit :
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>> may you please add the network config of your host & lxc guests (incl. routes), for my part, I don't get the picture
>> quite yet.
>>
>>
>> On 07/08/2016 05:17 PM, Guillaume wrote:
>>> I may have found lead, only on the host side.
>>>
>>>
>>>  From proxmox, i can't ping the lxc container private address
>>>
>>> root at srv3:~# ping 192.168.30.101
>>> PING 192.168.30.101 (192.168.30.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> ^C
>>> --- 192.168.30.101 ping statistics ---
>>> 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 999ms
>>>
>>>
>>> But i can ping another server private address (same vrack) :
>>> root at srv3:~# ping 192.168.30.250
>>> PING 192.168.30.250 (192.168.30.250) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.30.250: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.630 ms
>>> ^C
>>> --- 192.168.30.250 ping statistics ---
>>> 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.630/0.630/0.630/0.000 ms
>>>
>>>
>>> But, if i force the ping network interface on vmbr2 (host private network interface) :
>>>
>>> root at srv3:~# ping -I vmbr2 192.168.30.101
>>> PING 192.168.30.101 (192.168.30.101) from 192.168.30.3 vmbr2: 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.30.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.084 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.30.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.024 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.30.101: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
>>> ^C
>>> --- 192.168.30.101 ping statistics ---
>>> 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 1998ms
>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.024/0.047/0.084/0.027 ms
>>>
>>>
>>> It is strange since i have a route on vmbr2 for 192.168.30.0 :
>>>
>>> root at srv3:~# route
>>> Kernel IP routing table
>>> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
>>> default         164.132.168.254 0.0.0.0         UG    0 0        0 vmbr0
>>> 51.254.233.80   *               255.255.255.240 U     0 0        0 vmbr0
>>> 164.132.168.0   *               255.255.255.0   U     0 0        0 vmbr0
>>> 192.168.30.0    *               255.255.255.0   U     0 0        0 vmbr2
>>> 224.0.0.0       *               240.0.0.0       U     0 0        0 vmbr0
>>>
>>> This solution doesn't change anything for the container. If i try to ping a container (public or private interface) from
>>> another while forcing the interface, it doesn't help.
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 08/07/2016 à 11:11, Guillaume a écrit :
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm running Proxmox 4.2-15, with a fresh install :
>>>>
>>>> # pveversion -v
>>>> proxmox-ve: 4.2-56 (running kernel: 4.4.13-1-pve)
>>>> pve-manager: 4.2-15 (running version: 4.2-15/6669ad2c)
>>>> pve-kernel-4.4.13-1-pve: 4.4.13-56
>>>> pve-kernel-4.2.8-1-pve: 4.2.8-41
>>>> lvm2: 2.02.116-pve2
>>>> corosync-pve: 2.3.5-2
>>>> libqb0: 1.0-1
>>>> pve-cluster: 4.0-42
>>>> qemu-server: 4.0-83
>>>> pve-firmware: 1.1-8
>>>> libpve-common-perl: 4.0-70
>>>> libpve-access-control: 4.0-16
>>>> libpve-storage-perl: 4.0-55
>>>> pve-libspice-server1: 0.12.5-2
>>>> vncterm: 1.2-1
>>>> pve-qemu-kvm: 2.5-19
>>>> pve-container: 1.0-70
>>>> pve-firewall: 2.0-29
>>>> pve-ha-manager: 1.0-32
>>>> ksm-control-daemon: 1.2-1
>>>> glusterfs-client: 3.5.2-2+deb8u2
>>>> lxc-pve: 1.1.5-7
>>>> lxcfs: 2.0.0-pve2
>>>> cgmanager: 0.39-pve1
>>>> criu: 1.6.0-1
>>>> zfsutils: 0.6.5.7-pve10~bpo80
>>>>
>>>> # sysctl -p
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.all.autoconf = 0
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.default.autoconf = 0
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.vmbr0.autoconf = 0
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 0
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra = 0
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.vmbr0.accept_ra = 0
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.vmbr0.accept_ra = 0
>>>> net.ipv6.conf.vmbr0.autoconf = 0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm only using lxc containers.
>>>>
>>>> Host have 2 networks interfaces, vmbr0 with public ip 164.132.161.131/32 (gtw 164.132.161.254) and vmbr2 with private
>>>> ip (ovh vrack 2) 192.168.30.3/24.
>>>> Containers have public interface eth0 with public ip address (based on vmbr0) and eth1 with private ip address (based
>>>> on vmbr2) :
>>>>
>>>> * LXC1
>>>>      eth0 : 51.254.231.80/28
>>>>      eth1 : 192.168.30.101/24
>>>>
>>>> * LXC2
>>>>      eth0 : 51.254.231.81/28
>>>>      eth1 : 192.168.30.102/24
>>>>
>>>> They both have access to the net, but can't talk to each other, whatever network interface (public or private) i'm
>>>> using.
>>>> Same issue with firewall down on the node (on the 3 levels).
>>>>
>>>> # Ping from LXC1 51.254.231.80 to LXC2 51.254.231.81 : tcpdump from LXC1
>>>> 15:54:00.810638 ARP, Request who-has 164.132.161.250 tell 164.132.161.252, length 46
>>>>
>>>> # Ping from LXC1 192.168.30.101 to LXC2 192.168.30.102 (vrack) : tcpdump from LXC1
>>>> 15:54:52.260934 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.30.102 tell 192.168.30.3, length 28
>>>> 15:54:52.260988 ARP, Reply 192.168.30.102 is-at 62:31:32:34:65:61 (oui Unknown), length 28
>>>> 15:54:52.575082 IP 192.168.30.102 > 192.168.30.101: ICMP echo request, id 1043, seq 3, length 64
>>>> 15:54:53.583057 IP 192.168.30.102 > 192.168.30.101: ICMP echo request, id 1043, seq 4, length 64
>>>>
>>>> # Ping from LXC1 192.168.30.101 to LXC2 192.168.30.102 (vrack) : tcpdump from Proxmox
>>>> 17:56:05.861665 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.30.101 tell 192.168.30.102, length 28
>>>> 17:56:05.861688 ARP, Reply 192.168.30.101 is-at 62:31:32:34:65:61 (oui Unknown), length 28
>>>> 17:56:06.860925 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.30.101 tell 192.168.30.102, length 28
>>>> 17:56:06.860998 ARP, Reply 192.168.30.101 is-at 62:31:32:34:65:61 (oui Unknown), length 28
>>>>
>>>> Any idea ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Guillaume
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pve-user mailing list
>>>> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>>>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pve-user mailing list
>>> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>> Cheers,
>> Alwin
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-user mailing list
>> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Cheers,
Alwin



More information about the pve-user mailing list