[PVE-User] Regression on virtio-net ? (Was: Re: Proxmox VE 4.2 released!)
Alexandre DERUMIER
aderumier at odiso.com
Fri Apr 29 00:47:40 CEST 2016
Can you try with previous kernel 4.2 ? (and keep proxmox 4.2 )
I would like to known if it's a regression in qemu or kernel.
also, you can try to install
#apt-get install linux-tools-4.4
and do a
#perf top
you should see which system call use a lot of cpu
----- Mail original -----
De: "Gilou" <contact+dev at gilouweb.com>
À: "proxmoxve" <pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2016 19:31:19
Objet: Re: [PVE-User] Regression on virtio-net ? (Was: Re: Proxmox VE 4.2 released!)
Le 28/04/2016 19:18, Gilou a écrit :
> Le 27/04/2016 15:35, Martin Maurer a écrit :
>> Hi all!
>>
>> We are proud to announce the final release of our Proxmox VE 4.2 with
>> the new GUI.
>>
>> The Sencha Ext JS 6 framework brings a modern 'flat design' look and
>> feel to the Proxmox VE GUI with a reworked icon set providing
>> consistency and an improved user experience.
>>
>> Watch our short introduction video - What's new in Proxmox VE 4.2
>> http://www.proxmox.com/en/training/video-tutorials/item/what-s-new-in-proxmox-ve-4-2
>>
>>
>> This point release is based on latest and greatest Debian Jessie and a
>> 4.4.6 Linux kernel, based on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS kernel.
>
> Hi,
>
> I seem to have a regression, and a weird one I see neither on Proxmox
> 4.1 4.2.6's kernel, nor on Ubuntu 4.4.0, or
>
> Context: Ubuntu Guest VM using Ubuntu 16.04 on a virtio_net device
> (tested also on Debian 8, and CentOS7), connected on a bridge.
>
> on 4.1 : 1 Gbps bandwidth, ~1 GHz of CPU
> on 4.2 : 1 Gbps bandwidth, ~3 GHz of CPU
>
> Tested using transfer to /dev/null & iperf, so no disk involved.
>
> I do not have the issue on ubuntu 4.4.0 using virtualbox/virtio-net.
>
> Haven't tested further, but this is an isssue.
Looked into it, it's really 100% of a core, in the following setups:
- single CPU on the VM
- local or remote traffic (local goes up to 24 Gbps, remote is 1 Gbps)
- no matter what distro (haven't tested Windows)
Has anyone noticed something like this or is this something specific?
Regards,
>
> Regards,
> Gilles Pietri
>
>
>>
>> We included as always countless small improvements and bugfixes, like
>> the ability to use Let´s Encrypt certificates.
>>
>> Release notes
>> http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Roadmap#Proxmox_VE_4.2
>>
>> ISO Download
>>
>> http://www.proxmox.com/en/downloads
>>
>> Alternate ISO download:
>> http://download.proxmox.com/iso/
>>
>> Upgrading
>> http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Downloads
>>
>> Bugtracker
>> https://bugzilla.proxmox.com
>>
>> A big THANK-YOU to our active community for all feedback, testing, bug
>> reporting and patch submissions.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
More information about the pve-user
mailing list