[PVE-User] I try hard but...

Gerald Brandt gbr at majentis.com
Thu Oct 29 13:01:58 CET 2015


I didn't use OCFS, eithet XFS or EXT4.  No need for OCFS unless you're 
dual primary.

Maybe OCFS is doing something weird for you?

Gerald


On 2015-10-29 06:50 AM, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
> That's precisely my scenario...
> I have DRBD + OCFS and a gigaethernet cable link the two server.
> The server with DRBD + OCFS has NFS with ubuntu 14.
>
>
> 2015-10-29 9:43 GMT-02:00 Gerald Brandt <gbr at majentis.com 
> <mailto:gbr at majentis.com>>:
>
>     I use NFSv4, and I've never had any problems.  You have to hand
>     modify the storage config file.  I've used Ubuntu NFS servers with
>     DRBD, and more recently, Synology boxes (again with DRBD).  I also
>     bond my network links for 2GB bandwidth.
>
>     I'm not sure why Proxmox doesn't support NFSv4 out of the box.
>
>     Gerald
>
>
>
>     On 2015-10-29 04:46 AM, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
>>     Hi guys
>>
>>     Last night, i get IO error again!
>>     Perhaps i must give up NFS and considrer glusterFS or iSCSI???
>>
>>     Thanks for any help
>>
>>     Best regards
>>
>>     2015-10-27 13:25 GMT-02:00 Gilberto Nunes
>>     <gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com <mailto:gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>         What you say if drop soft and leave only proto=udp???
>>
>>         2015-10-27 12:36 GMT-02:00 Michael Rasmussen <mir at miras.org
>>         <mailto:mir at miras.org>>:
>>
>>             Remember softlocks is dangerous and can cause data loss.
>>
>>
>>             On October 27, 2015 2:58:25 PM CET, Gilberto Nunes
>>             <gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com
>>             <mailto:gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Now the VM seems to doing well...
>>
>>                 I put some limits on the Virtual HD ( Thanks Dmitry),
>>                 mount NFS with soft and proto=udp, and right now
>>                 stress the VM with a lot of impasync jobs, in order
>>                 to migrate huge mailbox to oldserver to the VM...
>>                 I will performe others tests yet, but I thing there
>>                 peace here again...
>>                 Thanks for help and sorry to blame proxmox, guys!
>>                 My apologies!
>>
>>
>>                 2015-10-26 17:55 GMT-02:00 Hector Suarez Planas
>>                 <hector.suarez at codesa.co.cu
>>                 <mailto:hector.suarez at codesa.co.cu>>:
>>
>>                     ...
>>
>>                         Answer my own question: yes! There is a bug
>>                         related NFS on kernel 3.13 that is the
>>                         default on Ubuntu 14.04...
>>                         I will try with kernel 3.19...
>>                         Sorry for sent this to the list...
>>
>>
>>                     Rectify is wise. Do not blame Proxmox for every
>>                     bad thing that happens to you with it. You must
>>                     have patience with things that come from the
>>                     world of Open Source.
>>
>>                     :-)
>>
>>                     -- 
>>                     =====================================
>>                     Lic. Hector Suarez Planas
>>                     Administrador Nodo CODESA
>>                     Santiago de Cuba
>>                     -------------------------------------
>>                     Blog: http://nihilanthlnxc.cubava.cu/
>>                     ICQ ID: 681729738
>>                     Conferendo ID: hspcuba
>>                     =====================================
>>
>>                     _______________________________________________
>>                     pve-user mailing list
>>                     pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>>                     <mailto:pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
>>                     http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>             -- 
>>             Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse
>>             my brevity.
>>             ---- This mail was virus scanned and spam checked before
>>             delivery. This mail is also DKIM signed. See header
>>             dkim-signature.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         -- 
>>
>>         Gilberto Ferreira
>>         +55 (47) 9676-7530 <tel:%2B55%20%2847%29%209676-7530>
>>         Skype: gilberto.nunes36
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>     Gilberto Ferreira
>>     +55 (47) 9676-7530 <tel:%2B55%20%2847%29%209676-7530>
>>     Skype: gilberto.nunes36
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     pve-user mailing list
>>     pve-user at pve.proxmox.com <mailto:pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
>>     http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     pve-user mailing list
>     pve-user at pve.proxmox.com <mailto:pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
>     http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Gilberto Ferreira
> +55 (47) 9676-7530
> Skype: gilberto.nunes36
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20151029/f3b63de1/attachment-0015.html>


More information about the pve-user mailing list