[PVE-User] NFS x GlusterFS

Gilberto Nunes gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 19 20:31:25 CEST 2014


No CT's! Just KVM...

2014-09-19 15:28 GMT-03:00 Michael Rasmussen <mir at miras.org>:

> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:22:21 -0300
> Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Which is better for VM allocation??
> >
> > Any advice?
> >
> If you want to use CT's and be able to make online migration you should
> stick to NFS since current GlusterFS has a bug which prevents online
> migration of CT's.
>
> --
> Hilsen/Regards
> Michael Rasmussen
>
> Get my public GnuPG keys:
> michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
> mir <at> datanom <dot> net
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
> mir <at> miras <dot> org
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> /usr/games/fortune -es says:
> Look DEEP into the OPENINGS!!  Do you see any ELVES or EDSELS ... or a
> HIGHBALL?? ...
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20140919/93cccab6/attachment-0015.html>


More information about the pve-user mailing list