[PVE-User] NFS x GlusterFS

[Michael Rasmussen]

On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:22:21 -0300
Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Which is better for VM allocation??
> 
> Any advice?
> 
If you want to use CT's and be able to make online migration you should
stick to NFS since current GlusterFS has a bug which prevents online
migration of CT's.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
Look DEEP into the OPENINGS!!  Do you see any ELVES or EDSELS ... or a
HIGHBALL?? ...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20140919/2a6506d1/attachment.sig>