[PVE-User] Proxmox Wishlist
elacunza at binovo.es
Wed Jun 25 09:34:58 CEST 2014
On 25/06/14 09:26, admin-at-extremeshok-dot-com wrote:
> Usually mdadm on a boot/root partition leads to corruption, have you
> failed/replaced a drive and tried to recover ?
> Relying on something is only good until it fails ..
I have done so a couple of times, without issues, but not on our Proxmox
deployments. We use mdadm for VM data only, root/boot partitions are on
I have even recovered a mdadm softraid1 data from a failed Iomega
storcenter ix2 NAS that was in the process of recovering de raid1, just
pluging the disks to a regular PC.
> On 6/25/2014 9:02 AM, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
>> On 24/06/14 23:22, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>>>>> 3.) Software RAID/Fake-RAID is not suited for the enterprise
>>>>> environment, with that said, you can still run Proxmox on Software
>>>>> RAID, but it's not supported. You don't need a $300 RAID card, I
>>>>> bought a complete >>server recently for $200 that had a built-in
>>>>> LSI SAS1064E controller
>>> I'm begin to test raid management at lvm level (available since last
>>> lvm releases), maybe it could be easy to extend the proxmox installer.
>> I made some tests months ago, and I was socked to see that when a
>> disk in LVM raid-1 broke, LVM provided no warning (as opposed to
>> mdadm, that sends a message and logs to syslog).
>> Maybe it was bad configuration on my part, but it made us continue to
>> use mdadm for softRAID and never look back.
>> BTW, we have mdadm deployed for production purposes in a pair of
>> clusters with success. I think that with the level of expertise
>> required to manage mdadm softRAID, relaying on the debian installer
>> is good enough.
Zuzendari Teknikoa / Director Técnico
Binovo IT Human Project, S.L.
Astigarraga bidea 2, planta 6 dcha., ofi. 3-2; 20180 Oiartzun (Gipuzkoa)
More information about the pve-user