[PVE-User] HA migration behaviour vs. failures

[Dietmar Maurer]

If kvm migration command fails, how can you assume that the VM is still OK?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pve-user [mailto:pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of
> Dhaussy Alexandre
> Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2014 14:26
> To: pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] HA migration behaviour vs. failures
> 
> Typo, /usr/share/cluster/vm.sh, not /usr/share/vm.sh
> 
> Le 24/07/2014 14:15, Dhaussy Alexandre a écrit :
> > In broad outline.
> >
> > With RedHat cluster :
> > 1/ @node1: clusvcadm -M vm:foo -m node2 2/ @node2: kill the kvm/foo
> > process 3/ @node1: clusvcadm fails with non-critical error (OCF code
> > 150, see
> > /usr/share/vm.sh)
> >
> > => You are happy and your VM is still in a good health.
> >
> > With Proxmox :
> > 1/ @node1: clusvcadm -M pvevm:foo -m node2 2/ @node2: kill the kvm/foo
> > process 3/ @node1: clusvcadm fails with code 1 (OCF_ERR_GENERIC),
> > which ends up doing "clusvcadm -d pvevm:foo"
> >
> > => Your VM is dead.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> >
> > Alexandre DHAUSSY
> >
> > Le 24/07/2014 12:49, Dietmar Maurer a écrit :
> >
> >>> Sorry for being a bit cheeky here, but why did you change the way
> >>> RedHat cluster behaves with online migration
> >> I am not aware that we changed that?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user