[PVE-User] My suggestion about explicit name in bridge configuration

Diaolin (Giuliano Natali) diaolin at diaolin.com
Mon Feb 17 20:15:26 CET 2014

I think that it would be better with the real name but.... you said it's hardcoded. I' ve not found where but OK..

Ciao, diaolin

Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> ha scritto:

>> Now it's clear...
>> I should tale a look deeper in the code
>> Or perhaps use a minus sign? Instead of v?
>Another limitation is the max. length of the interface name (limit hardcoded inside the kernel).
>So I am really against using interface names that way.
>Besides, in future, we want to set additional attributes for specific network. For example the
>list of available IP addresses, ...
>I can imagine that there will be space to add further attributes ...
>But for now, you can use 'comments' (yes, I know it is not optimal)

More information about the pve-user mailing list