[PVE-User] About GRE tunnels and the new OVS bridging

[diaolin]

No even with vxlan same disaster

Sorry

Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier at odiso.com> ha scritto:

>Hi Diaolin,
>
>maybe ovs vxlan tunnel could help ? maybe less overhead than a gre tunnel
>
>
>----- Mail original -----
>
>De: "Diaolin" <diaolin at diaolin.com>
>À: "pve-user pve.proxmox.com" <pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>
>Envoyé: Mardi 22 Avril 2014 09:15:04
>Objet: [PVE-User] About GRE tunnels and the new OVS bridging
>
>As i said to Dietmar i tested it intensively for
>adding a patch to adopt it in the PVE interface.
>
>Result:
>
>- very slow if the network is Gigabit (max 350Mbit)
>- the transport has no encryption
>
>I think that the better solution is to use a VLAN and
>use the entire bandwidth (if needed).
>
>I probed with openvpn crypted and uncrypted and i had
>a better result (more than 50% of the net bandwidth)
>
>This happens due to the use of bridging because if i use
>(as route) a real interface and not a vmbr the result
>are very good (OVS or OpenVPN).
>
>And despite i didn't write the patch...
>
>Sorry but if you intend to use a transport create one with
>openvpn (even in MESH mode) that works better and is encrypted
>
>Diaolin
>
>
>
>
>
>---
>S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét
>crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi
>e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti
>a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna
>[Diaolin]
>_______________________________________________
>pve-user mailing list
>pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
>http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user