[PVE-User] Proxmox on DRBD and OCFS2/GFS

Rob Fantini rob at fantinibakery.com
Wed Aug 28 17:14:07 CEST 2013


Hello Eneko
 thank you for the info.

 We're also going to use drbd active/active .    We used drbd in 1.9  
Primary/Secondary .  And for awhile in pve  version2 used active/active.

 We'll use active-active  and  run our high available  kvm's  only on 
one node.   I think that active-active drbd  can be dangerous .

 DRBD seems to be the most  dependable  way to have high available 
storage for our setup. Next year we'll test  Ceph , Sheepdog and 
Glusterfs .

On Wed 28 Aug 2013 07:15:23 AM EDT, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 28/08/13 03:41, Rob Fantini wrote:
>> Please, can you give some information about the 'shared-storage HA
>> setup'  you mentioned?
>>> We finally discarded it (were trying active-active configuration)
>>> in-house, we felt it gave us more headaches than the peace-of-mind
>>> potentially gained by a shared-storage HA setup. We didn't have
>>> experience with DRBD so maybe it was us not setting up correctly.
> What I meant is that we discarded to use DRBD in active-active
> configuration, which is a way to have "shared" storage without
> actually sharing physically an storage.
>
> Cheers
> Eneko
> --
> Zuzendari Teknikoa / Director T├ęcnico
> Binovo IT Human Project, S.L.
> Telf. 943575997
>        943493611
> Astigarraga bidea 2, planta 6 dcha., ofi. 3-2; 20180 Oiartzun (Gipuzkoa)
> www.binovo.es
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user



More information about the pve-user mailing list