[PVE-User] sheepdog, btrfs and tests

[Alexandre DERUMIER]

>>Great, thanks. I will try this one.
>>Ceph/sheepdog is not added in the WEB in the latest version?
>>If adding them in the WEB, just only change the "pve-manager" module?
>>is there any other module need to change?
You can add the storage with pve-manager. (so you need to edit /etc/pve/storage.cfg).

But you can create vm, disk,snapshots,.. with the pve-manager. 


----- Mail original ----- 

De: "para zheng" <para.pve at gmail.com> 
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com> 
Cc: "Flavio Stanchina" <flavio.stanchina at ies.it>, pve-user at pve.proxmox.com, "Fábio Rabelo" <fabio at fabiorabelo.wiki.br> 
Envoyé: Mardi 9 Octobre 2012 11:04:53 
Objet: Re: [PVE-User] sheepdog, btrfs and tests 

2012/10/9 Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier at odiso.com>: 
> Ceph is more stable for now. 
Great, thanks. I will try this one. 
Ceph/sheepdog is not added in the WEB in the latest version? 
If adding them in the WEB, just only change the "pve-manager" module? 
is there any other module need to change? 
> 
> about performance, we have benched : 
> random io : 20.000iops on ceph and 40.000iops on sheepdog. (with ssd cluster) 
It seems the stable one's performance is not good... A difficult choice ;) 
> seq bandwith: more than 10gigabit of bandwith for both 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original ----- 
> 
> De: "para zheng" <para.pve at gmail.com> 
> À: "Fábio Rabelo" <fabio at fabiorabelo.wiki.br> 
> Cc: "Flavio Stanchina" <flavio.stanchina at ies.it>, pve-user at pve.proxmox.com 
> Envoyé: Mardi 9 Octobre 2012 03:17:52 
> Objet: Re: [PVE-User] sheepdog, btrfs and tests 
> 
> Besides sheepdog, there is another file system, which name is ceph, is 
> able to work with Proxmox. why not have a test with that? 
> 
> I have one doubt, and have not read any materials: between the two 
> file system(sheepdog and ceph), which is more suitable for Proxmox? 
> from the view of performance, stability and so on... 
> 
> thanks, 
> 
> 2012/10/9 Fábio Rabelo <fabio at fabiorabelo.wiki.br>: 
>> 2012/10/8 Flavio Stanchina <flavio.stanchina at ies.it> 
>>> 
>>> On 08/10/2012 19:36, Fábio Rabelo wrote: 
>>> > The Storage ( not arrived yet ) will use either Freenas or Nas4Free , 
>>> > with 
>>> > 256 GB of RAM for 12 2TB hard disks, [...] 
>>> > Here in Brasil, the additional cost of a Storage takes virtualization 
>>> > away 
>>> > from most of possible customers ... 
>>> 
>>> Ah, I wish I had that kind of storage here. If that's what you have to 
>>> live 
>>> with to keep costs down over there in Brasil, I think I'll propose to move 
>>> the office near one of your sunny beaches before winter starts. Should be 
>>> able to buy the storage and a couple of servers with the money we won't 
>>> spend for heating! 
>> 
>> 
>> Don't get too excited, it is one of 3 or at most 4 customers in my "pool" 
>> that have this kind of budget ! 
>> 
>> All the "rest" of the customers of mine do not have that kind of money to 
>> spend on a Supermicro Storage . 
>> 
>> It is for that people, 30 or 35 of then, that I thinking about a self 
>> contained 3 node cluster, maybe with sheepdog ... 
>> 
>> 
>> Fábio Rabelo 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> pve-user mailing list 
>> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com 
>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user 
>> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> pve-user mailing list 
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com 
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user