[PVE-User] 2.0: a matter of taste

Martin Maurer martin at proxmox.com
Tue Oct 25 16:19:13 CEST 2011

I see no problem if you want to donate. The only issue is that you just announce it so far.

Means the donation button works for others so I assume it should also work for you.


From: pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com [mailto:pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of obj at jltechinc.com
Sent: Montag, 24. Oktober 2011 18:44
To: pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] 2.0: a matter of taste

Hmmm, what happened to that donate button?

Martin? Deitmar?


obj at jltechinc.com<mailto:obj at jltechinc.com> said the following on 10/24/2011 12:18 PM:
This is going to be an absolute game changer!

I've been pulling my hair out trying to configure 4 boxes for each location:
2 for Proxmox VMs (Clustering), and 2 for data redundancy.

Great work guys, I'm donating some more $$ today!


Alain Péan said the following on 10/24/2011 06:05 AM:
Le 24/10/2011 11:32, Patryk Benderz a écrit :


And a big difference to almost all competitors: no single point of failure, due to pmxcfs.
Could you elaborate particularly what are you referring to, when
speaking of "single point of failure"?

Hi Patryk,

If I can answer for Martin... I think he is referring to what is described in the roadmap :

So, with pmxcfs, there is no more a single master node, that can be a SPOF.

And I can add, that if 'Sheepdog' was configured (distributed storage among the nodes), there will be no need for central storage as iSCSI, or FC, that are also SPOF, even if they have redundant Controller, Power Supply, multipath... etc (furthermore, they are very expensive). See :



pve-user mailing list

pve-user at pve.proxmox.com<mailto:pve-user at pve.proxmox.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20111025/215f4891/attachment-0014.html>

More information about the pve-user mailing list