[PVE-User] Clustered FS? (ProxMox 2.0)

[James Mills]

Which probably wouldn't work for OpenVZ containers for example :/

cheers
James

-- 
*James Mills
Systems Engineer* P:  07 3847 9292
E:  james.mills at overthewire.com.au
W: http://www.overthewire.com.au



On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:59, Martin Maurer <martin at proxmox.com> wrote:

>  Yes, sheepdog will be an option. But sheepdog is not a clustered FS,
> it’s a distributed block level volume storage for kvm.****
>
> ** **
>
> Martin****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com [mailto:
> pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com] *On Behalf Of *Jean Rousseau Franco
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 15. November 2011 17:58
>
> *To:* pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> *Subject:* Re: [PVE-User] Clustered FS? (ProxMox 2.0)****
>
>  ** **
>
> What about sheepdog?
>
> I thought it was gonna be responsible for the image store accross nodes.**
> **
>
>  2011/11/15 James Mills <james.mills at overthewire.com.au>****
>
> Cool no worries.****
>
> ** **
>
> So a clsuteredfs for image storage****
>
> or shared storage for images is up to the****
>
> system integrator.****
>
> ** **
>
> cheers****
>
> James
> ****
>
>
> -- ****
>
> *James Mills*
> *Systems Engineer*****
>
> P:  07 3847 9292
> E:  james.mills at overthewire.com.au
> W: http://www.overthewire.com.au****
>
> ****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 17:01, Martin Maurer <martin at proxmox.com> wrote:**
> **
>
> Hi,****
>
>  ****
>
> No disk images, for configuration files only (and small other files, some
> logs)****
>
>  ****
>
> Martin****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com [mailto:
> pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com] *On Behalf Of *James Mills
> *Sent:* Montag, 14. November 2011 22:51
> *To:* pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> *Subject:* Re: [PVE-User] Clustered FS? (ProxMox 2.0)****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks Martin, but unless I'm missing somthing,****
>
> nowhere on this page does it mention that this will be****
>
> used for anything else other than configuration data.****
>
>  ****
>
> cheers****
>
> James
> ****
>
>
> -- ****
>
> *James Mills*
> *Systems Engineer*****
>
> P:  07 3847 9292
> E:  james.mills at overthewire.com.au
> W: http://www.overthewire.com.au****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 00:04, Martin Maurer <martin at proxmox.com> wrote:**
> **
>
> See http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Proxmox_Cluster_file_system_(pmxcfs)****
>
> Containing all answers to your questions.****
>
>  ****
>
> Martin****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com [mailto:
> pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com] *On Behalf Of *James Mills
> *Sent:* Montag, 14. November 2011 14:04
> *To:* pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> *Subject:* [PVE-User] Clustered FS? (ProxMox 2.0)****
>
>  ****
>
> HI all,****
>
>  ****
>
> I can't seem to find a definitive answer for this.****
>
> Sure, ProxMox 2.0's RoadMap and other docs****
>
> seem to indicate a clustered, database driven****
>
> file system for real-time configuration storage and****
>
> replication across nodes.****
>
>  ****
>
> But, nowhere can I find any evidence that such a****
>
> clustered file system will be available or used for****
>
> storage of vms (root, private data). Is this a planned****
>
> feature or am I missing something? Is one expected****
>
> to use Shared Storage (SAN/NAS) still?****
>
>  ****
>
> cheers****
>
> James
> ****
>
>
> -- ****
>
> *James Mills*
> *Systems Engineer*****
>
> P:  07 3847 9292
> E:  james.mills at overthewire.com.au
> W: http://www.overthewire.com.au****
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user****
>
>       ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/attachments/20111116/4b72552f/attachment.htm>