[PVE-User] bond0 Issues

[Andrew Niemantsverdriet]

Dietmar,

I am not sure what AoE is? Could you explain?

And 4 NIC's bonded gives 4 times the bandwidth as well as fault
tolerance. Which is really good for some of our servers. It makes
migrating servers a little easier because it adds a little abstraction
to the network layer. Now I have each interface as a separate bridge
to keep some of our high bandwidth severs happy. When having to
migrate them it is really hard to keep track of which server is using
what bridge so that two high bandwidth servers don't have to share a
link causing slow downs for the users. I was hoping to try and use a
bond interface to eliminate that issue.

Thanks,
 _
/-\ ndrew

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Dietmar Maurer<dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:
> Do you use AoE?
>
>
> Besides, I do not think it makes sense to use 4 nics in one bond.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pve-user-bounces at pve.proxmox.com [mailto:pve-user-
>> bounces at pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Niemantsverdriet
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2009 21:20
>> To: proxmoxve
>> Subject: [PVE-User] bond0 Issues
>>
>> I have setup a bond0 interface containing eth0 eth1 eth2 eth3. I setup
>> the bond interface with balance-rr and then set vmbr0 to contain
>> bond0. When I rebooted the machine for the change to take effect I saw
>> this scroll across the console:
>>
>> bond0 received packet with own address as source address
>>
>> It also caused the network to be very unstable with 70% packet loss.
>>
>
>



-- 
 _
/-\ ndrew Niemantsverdriet
Academic Computing
(406) 238-7360
Rocky Mountain College
1511 Poly Dr.
Billings MT, 59102