[pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES qemu/storage/qemu-server/container/manager v7 00/37] backup provider API

Friedrich Weber f.weber at proxmox.com
Thu Apr 3 15:55:48 CEST 2025


On 03/04/2025 09:52, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 05:15:24PM +0200, Friedrich Weber wrote:
>> Hi, I tried v7 very quickly with the backup-provider-dir-example
>> storage. Some minor things I noticed below, IMO nothing that can't be
>> fixed in follow-ups.
>>
>> Note that I didn't look too closely how the backup provider API really
>> works, so some of the following may just be consequences of the example
>> backup-provider-dir-example plugin being an example plugin, in this case
>> feel free to ignore:
>>
>> - naively triggering a one-off VM backup fails with "ERROR: cannot setup
>> backup access without fleecing". I understand why and this is nothing
>> critical, but I can imagine this could cause some confusion (e.g. if
>> users don't immediately read the relevant ERROR line of the task log).
>> Might be nice to either allow enabling fleecing also for one-off
>> backups, or disable the "Backup Now" button for external storages.
> 
> Agreed, it would certainly be a nicer UX if we could select the fleecing
> storage and/or expose to the UI whether a fleecing storage default is
> set for this.
> But I don't see this as a blocker right now (particularly if the example
> plugin cannot be set-up via the UI anyway, such UI consequences IMO
> don't need to block the roll-out of this series).

Agreed, I don't see it as a blocker either.

> [...]
>> - by accident I let the destination filesystem run full, which resulted
>> in a stuck backup task and the following message being spammed to the
>> journal:
>>
>>> Apr 02 16:46:34 pve-backupprovider kernel: block nbd0: Other side
>> returned error (28)
>>
>> Maybe there is a way to abort the backup in such a case?
> 
> Sounds like an issue in the example provider, but will have to check,
> it's not very obvious where this would happen, as the read/write access
> to/from the nbd devices is checked for errors.
> The provider would have to bubble up the errors. If it keeps rolling
> instead there's not much we can do on the API side.
> 
>>
>> - the VM backup wrote out the full 32G disk image including zeroes to
>> the qcow2, but from a quick look at the source this is probably
>> expected? Restoring this backup to e.g. lvm-thin gets rid of the zeroes
>> again, though.
> 
> The example plugin is a simple read/write loop which only ever uses the
> bitmap.
> I have another test plugin which, for when the bitmap is *new* (or does
> not exist), uses qemu's "base:allocation" information to query for
> holes via nbd. Also, an NBD client using structured replies will get
> told about zeroes/holes rather than receiving zeroes over the network.
> It is a bit tricky, though, as one cannot blindly ask for the allocation
> info via NBD as qemu will just return errors when trying to query
> the block status of parts which aren't dirty... 😦

Ah, I see ... so this is expected behavior for the example plugin, makes
sense.

>> - navigating to a VM backup on the backup-provider-dir-example storage
>> and clicking on "Edit Notes" fails with
>>
>>> failed to stat 'PVE::Storage::Custom::BackupProviderDirExamplePlugin'
>> (500)
>>
>> and the following message in the journal:
>>
>>> Apr 02 17:04:38 pve-backupprovider pvedaemon[960]: file_size_info:
>> detected call without $file_format parameter
> 
> Can you retry after fixing up the `BackupProviderDirExamplePlugin.pm` at
> line 260:
> 
>     - $class->file_size_info(...
>     + PVE::Storage::Plugin::file_size_info(...
> 

Yes, this works as expected -- shows empty notes and when attempting to
save notes, errors out with

> attribute 'notes' is not supported on backup-provider-dir-example
> volume at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/Storage/Custom/
> BackupProviderDirExamplePlugin.pm line 246. (500)

> This was apparently mistakenly called as a "class method" which means
> it used the class name as a file name, and the `undef` timeout ended up
> in the `file_format` parameter...

Heh, fun! :)




More information about the pve-devel mailing list