[pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 5/5] fix #4474: ui: guest stop: offer to overrule active shutdown tasks
Dominik Csapak
d.csapak at proxmox.com
Fri Apr 19 12:17:15 CEST 2024
some minor nits inline, aside from those
Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak at proxmox.com>
On 4/12/24 16:15, Friedrich Weber wrote:
> Implement a new "guest stop" confirmation message box which first
> checks if there is an active shutdown task for the same guest that is
> visible to the logged-in user. If there is at least one, the dialog
> displays an additional default-on checkbox for overruling active
> shutdown tasks. If the user confirms and the checkbox is checked, the
> UI sends a guest stop API request with the `overrule-shutdown`
> parameter set to 1. If there are no active shutdown tasks, or the
> checkbox is unchecked, the UI sends a guest stop API request without
> `overrule-shutdown`.
>
> To avoid an additional API request for querying active shutdown tasks,
> check the UI's current view of cluster tasks instead, which is fetched
> from the `pve-cluster-tasks` store.
>
> As the UI might hold an outdated task list, there are some
> opportunities for races, e.g., the UI may miss a new shutdown task or
> consider a shutdown task active even though it has already terminated.
> These races either result in a surviving shutdown task that the user
> still needs to abort manually, or a superfluous `override-shutdown=1`
> parameter that does not actually abort any tasks. Since "stop
> overrules shutdown" is merely a convenience feature, both outcomes
> seem bearable.
>
> The confirmation message box is now always marked as dangerous (with a
> warning sign icon), whereas previously it was only marked dangerous if
> the stop issued from the guest panel, but not when issued from the
> resource tree command menu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber at proxmox.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> changes v2 -> v3:
> - aligned permission checks with changed backend logic
> - replace access of `this.vm` with `me.vm`
>
> changes v1 -> v2:
> - instead of a second modal dialog that offers to overrule shutdown
> tasks, display an additional checkbox in the "guest stop"
> confirmation dialog if there is a running matching shutdown task
> - spin out pve-cluster-tasks store fix into its own patch
>
> www/manager6/Makefile | 1 +
> www/manager6/lxc/CmdMenu.js | 8 +++-
> www/manager6/lxc/Config.js | 8 ++--
> www/manager6/qemu/CmdMenu.js | 8 +++-
> www/manager6/qemu/Config.js | 8 ++--
> www/manager6/window/GuestStop.js | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 www/manager6/window/GuestStop.js
>
> diff --git a/www/manager6/Makefile b/www/manager6/Makefile
> index c756cae6..30c56bb9 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/Makefile
> +++ b/www/manager6/Makefile
> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ JSSRC= \
> window/ScheduleSimulator.js \
> window/Wizard.js \
> window/GuestDiskReassign.js \
> + window/GuestStop.js \
> window/TreeSettingsEdit.js \
> window/PCIMapEdit.js \
> window/USBMapEdit.js \
> diff --git a/www/manager6/lxc/CmdMenu.js b/www/manager6/lxc/CmdMenu.js
> index b1403fc6..76b39423 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/lxc/CmdMenu.js
> +++ b/www/manager6/lxc/CmdMenu.js
> @@ -66,7 +66,13 @@ Ext.define('PVE.lxc.CmdMenu', {
> iconCls: 'fa fa-fw fa-stop',
> disabled: stopped,
> tooltip: Ext.String.format(gettext('Stop {0} immediately'), 'CT'),
> - handler: () => confirmedVMCommand('stop'),
> + handler: () => {
> + Ext.create('PVE.GuestStop', {
> + nodename: info.node,
> + vm: info,
> + autoShow: true,
> + });
> + },
> },
> {
> text: gettext('Reboot'),
> diff --git a/www/manager6/lxc/Config.js b/www/manager6/lxc/Config.js
> index 4516ee8f..082913e1 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/lxc/Config.js
> +++ b/www/manager6/lxc/Config.js
> @@ -77,11 +77,13 @@ Ext.define('PVE.lxc.Config', {
> {
> text: gettext('Stop'),
> disabled: !caps.vms['VM.PowerMgmt'],
> - confirmMsg: Proxmox.Utils.format_task_description('vzstop', vmid),
> tooltip: Ext.String.format(gettext('Stop {0} immediately'), 'CT'),
> - dangerous: true,
> handler: function() {
> - vm_command("stop");
> + Ext.create('PVE.GuestStop', {
> + nodename: nodename,
> + vm: vm,
> + autoShow: true,
> + });
> },
> iconCls: 'fa fa-stop',
> }],
> diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/CmdMenu.js b/www/manager6/qemu/CmdMenu.js
> index 4f59d5f7..834577e7 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/qemu/CmdMenu.js
> +++ b/www/manager6/qemu/CmdMenu.js
> @@ -93,7 +93,13 @@ Ext.define('PVE.qemu.CmdMenu', {
> iconCls: 'fa fa-fw fa-stop',
> disabled: stopped,
> tooltip: Ext.String.format(gettext('Stop {0} immediately'), 'VM'),
> - handler: () => confirmedVMCommand('stop'),
> + handler: () => {
> + Ext.create('PVE.GuestStop', {
> + nodename: info.node,
> + vm: info,
> + autoShow: true,
> + });
> + },
> },
> {
> text: gettext('Reboot'),
> diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/Config.js b/www/manager6/qemu/Config.js
> index 2f9605a4..f28ee67b 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/qemu/Config.js
> +++ b/www/manager6/qemu/Config.js
> @@ -176,11 +176,13 @@ Ext.define('PVE.qemu.Config', {
> }, {
> text: gettext('Stop'),
> disabled: !caps.vms['VM.PowerMgmt'],
> - dangerous: true,
> tooltip: Ext.String.format(gettext('Stop {0} immediately'), 'VM'),
> - confirmMsg: Proxmox.Utils.format_task_description('qmstop', vmid),
> handler: function() {
> - vm_command("stop", { timeout: 30 });
> + Ext.create('PVE.GuestStop', {
> + nodename: nodename,
> + vm: vm,
> + autoShow: true,
> + });
> },
> iconCls: 'fa fa-stop',
> }, {
> diff --git a/www/manager6/window/GuestStop.js b/www/manager6/window/GuestStop.js
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..16d05a70
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/www/manager6/window/GuestStop.js
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +Ext.define('PVE.GuestStop', {
> + extend: 'Ext.window.MessageBox',
> +
nit: imho a short high level description why we extend the messagebox instead
of e.g. our edit/safedestroy window would be nice
also maybe we could rewrite this a bit more generic so that the safedestroy
window users could this instead? (not necessary for now though)
> + closeAction: 'destroy',
> +
> + initComponent: function() {
> + let me = this;
> +
> + if (!me.nodename) {
> + throw "no node name specified";
> + }
> + if (!me.vm) {
> + throw "no vm specified";
> + }
> +
> + let vmid = me.vm.vmid;
> + let vmidString = vmid.toString();
> + let guestType = me.vm.type;
> + let overruleTaskType = guestType === 'qemu' ? 'qmshutdown' : 'vzshutdown';
> +
> + me.taskType = guestType === 'qemu' ? 'qmstop' : 'vzstop';
> + me.url = `/nodes/${me.nodename}/${guestType}/${vmid}/status/stop`;
> +
> + let caps = Ext.state.Manager.get('GuiCap');
> + let hasSysModify = caps.nodes['Sys.Modify'];
> +
> + // offer to overrule if there is at least one matching shutdown task
> + // and the guest is not HA-enabled.
> + // allow users to abort tasks started by one of their API tokens
> + let shutdownTaskIdx = Ext.getStore('pve-cluster-tasks')?.findBy(task =>
> + (hasSysModify || task.data.user === Proxmox.UserName) &&
> + task.data.id === vmidString &&
> + task.data.status === undefined &&
> + task.data.type === overruleTaskType,
> + );
> + let haEnabled = me.vm.hastate && me.vm.hastate !== 'unmanaged';
> + me.askOverrule = !haEnabled && shutdownTaskIdx >= 0;
> +
> + me.callParent();
> +
> + me.promptContainer.add({
nit: i guess this comes from the messagebox class?
a short comment what it is would be nice
> + xtype: 'proxmoxcheckbox',
> + name: 'overrule-shutdown',
> + checked: true,
> + boxLabel: gettext('Overrule active shutdown tasks'),
> + hidden: !me.askOverrule,
> + });
> + },
> +
> + handler: function(btn) {
> + let me = this;
> + if (btn === 'yes') {
> + let checkbox = me.promptContainer.down('proxmoxcheckbox[name=overrule-shutdown]');
> + let overruleShutdown = me.askOverrule && checkbox.getSubmitValue();
> + let params = overruleShutdown ? { 'overrule-shutdown': 1 } : undefined;
> + Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({
> + url: me.url,
> + waitMsgTarget: me,
> + method: 'POST',
> + params: params,
nit: if the property and the variable have the same name you can simply write
params,
in the list.
> + failure: function(response, opts) {
> + Ext.Msg.alert('Error', response.htmlStatus);
> + },
> + });
> + }
> + },
> +
> + show: function() {
> + let me = this;
> + let cfg = {
> + title: gettext('Confirm'),
> + icon: Ext.Msg.WARNING,
> + msg: Proxmox.Utils.format_task_description(me.taskType, me.vm.vmid),
> + buttons: Ext.Msg.YESNO,
> + callback: btn => me.handler(btn),
if we'd want to make this generic, we'd want to wrap any given callback
and call it instead of overwriting it with our own handler
> + };
> + me.callParent([cfg]);
> + },
> +});
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list