[pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common 1/1] helpers: add pool limit/usage helpers
Wolfgang Bumiller
w.bumiller at proxmox.com
Thu Apr 11 11:17:18 CEST 2024
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:13:06PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> one for combining the per-node broadcasted values, one for checking a pool's
> limit, and one specific helper for checking guest-related actions such as
> starting a VM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler at proxmox.com>
> ---
> src/PVE/GuestHelpers.pm | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 190 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/GuestHelpers.pm b/src/PVE/GuestHelpers.pm
> index 961a7b8..36b44bb 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/GuestHelpers.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/GuestHelpers.pm
> @@ -416,4 +416,194 @@ sub check_vnet_access {
> if !($tag || $trunks);
> }
>
> +# combines the broadcasted pool usage information to get per-pool stats
> +#
> +# $pools parsed pool info from user.cfg
> +# $usage broadcasted KV hash
> +# $pool filter for specific pool
> +# $skip skip a certain guest to ignore its current usage
> +#
> +# returns usage hash:
> +# pool -> cpu/mem/.. -> run/config -> $usage
> +sub get_pool_usage {
> + my ($pools, $usage, $pool, $skip) = @_;
> +
> + my $res = {};
> + my $included_guests = {};
> + for my $node (keys $usage->%*) {
> + my $node_usage = JSON::decode_json($usage->{$node} // '');
> +
> + # long IDs first, so we can add children to their parents right away
> + for my $poolid (sort {$b cmp $a} keys $pools->%*) {
> + next if defined($pool) && !($pool eq $poolid || $poolid =~ m!^$pool/! || $pool =~ m!^$poolid/!);
> +
> + my $d = $res->{$poolid} //= {
> + cpu => {
> + run => 0,
> + config => 0,
> + },
> + mem => {
> + run => 0,
> + config => 0,
> + },
> + };
> +
> + my $pool_usage = $node_usage->{data}->{$poolid} // {};
> + for my $vmid (keys $pool_usage->%*) {
> + # only include once in case of migration between broadcast
> + next if $included_guests->{$vmid};
> + next if $skip && $skip->{$vmid};
> + $included_guests->{$vmid} = 1;
> +
> + my $vm_data = $pool_usage->{$vmid};
> + for my $key (keys $vm_data->%*) {
> + next if $key eq 'running';
> + $d->{$key}->{run} += $vm_data->{$key}->{run} if $vm_data->{running};
> + $d->{$key}->{config} += $vm_data->{$key}->{config};
So here we autovivify more keys inside $d, so simply receiving them in
the $pool_usage will add them
...
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (my $parent = $pools->{$poolid}->{parent}) {
> + $res->{$parent} //= {
> + cpu => {
> + run=> 0,
> + config => 0,
> + },
> + mem => {
> + run => 0,
> + config => 0,
> + },
> + };
...
so would it make sense to just iterate over `keys %$d` here instead
of having `cpu` and `mem` hardcoded?
And/or maybe access-control should expose a list derived from
$pool_limits_desc directly (or helper sub) to deal with the
`-run`/`-config` suffixes
...
> + $res->{$parent}->{cpu}->{run} += $d->{cpu}->{run};
> + $res->{$parent}->{mem}->{run} += $d->{mem}->{run};
> + $res->{$parent}->{cpu}->{config} += $d->{cpu}->{config};
> + $res->{$parent}->{mem}->{config} += $d->{mem}->{config};
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return $res;
> +}
> +
> +# checks whether a pool is (or would be) over its resource limits
> +#
> +# $changes is for checking limits for config/state changes like VM starts, if
> +# set, only the limits with changes are checked (see check_guest_pool_limit)
> +#
> +# return value indicates whether any limit was overstepped or not (if $noerr is set)
> +sub check_pool_limits {
> + my ($usage, $limits, $noerr, $changes) = @_;
> +
> + my $over = {};
> + my $only_changed = defined($changes);
> +
> + my $check_limit = sub {
> + my ($key, $running, $limit, $change) = @_;
> +
> + return if $only_changed && $change == 0;
> +
> + my $kind = $running ? 'run' : 'config';
> +
> + my $value = $usage->{$key}->{$kind};
> + $value = int($value);
> + $value += $change;
> + $value = $value / (1024*1024) if $key eq 'mem';
> + if ($limit < $value) {
> + $over->{$key}->{$kind}->{change} = $change if $change;
> + $over->{$key}->{$kind}->{over} = 1;
> + }
> + };
> +
> + my $get_change = sub {
> + my ($key, $running) = @_;
> +
> + return 0 if !defined($changes);
> +
> + my $check_running = defined($changes->{running}) && $changes->{running} ? 1 : 0;
> +
> + if ($running == $check_running) {
> + return $changes->{$key} // 0;
> + } else {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + };
> +
> + if (my $limit = $limits->{"mem-run"}) {
> + my $change = $get_change->('mem', 1);
> + $check_limit->('mem', 1, $limit, $change);
> + }
> +
> + if (my $limit = $limits->{"mem-config"}) {
> + my $change = $get_change->('mem', 0);
> + $check_limit->('mem', 0, $limit, $change);
> + }
...
Similarly this could then iterate over the list.
> +
> + if (my $limit = $limits->{"cpu-run"}) {
> + my $change = $get_change->('cpu', 1);
> + $check_limit->('cpu', 1, $limit, $change);
> + }
> +
> + if (my $limit = $limits->{"cpu-config"}) {
> + my $change = $get_change->('cpu', 0);
> + $check_limit->('cpu', 0, $limit, $change);
> + }
> +
> + if (!$noerr) {
> + my $msg = '';
> + for my $key (keys $over->%*) {
> + for my $kind (keys $over->{$key}->%*) {
> + my $value = $usage->{$key}->{$kind};
> + $value = $value / (1024*1024) if $key eq 'mem';
> + my $change = $over->{$key}->{$kind}->{change};
> + if ($change) {
> + $change = $change / (1024*1024) if $key eq 'mem';
> + $value = "$value + $change" if $change;
> + }
> + my $limit = $limits->{"$key-$kind"};
> + $msg .= "($kind) $key: $value over $limit, ";
> + }
> + }
> + if ($msg) {
> + $msg =~ s/, $//;
> + die "pool limits exhausted: $msg\n";
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return $over->%* ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +# checks whether the given changes for a certain guest would overstep a pool limit
> +#
> +# $changes is an optional hash containing
> +# - absolute: flag whether changes are relative or absolute
> +# - running: flag whether the config or running limits should be checked
> +# - cpu: change value for cpu limit
> +# - mem: change value for mem limit
> +# all elements are optional
> +#
> +# if no $changes is provided, the limits are checked against the current usage
> +#
> +# $poolid allows overriding the guest's pool membership, for example in case it
> +# is not yet properly set when creating the guest
> +sub check_guest_pool_limit {
> + my ($vmid, $changes, $poolid) = @_;
> +
> + my $user_cfg = PVE::Cluster::cfs_read_file("user.cfg");
> +
> + $poolid = $user_cfg->{vms}->{$vmid} if !defined($poolid);
> + if ($poolid) {
> + my $pool = $user_cfg->{pools}->{$poolid};
> +
> + my $limits = $pool->{limits};
> + return if !$limits;
> +
> + my $skip = {};
> + $skip->{$vmid} = 1 if $changes && $changes->{absolute};
> + my $usage = PVE::Cluster::get_node_kv('pool-usage');
> +
> + $usage = PVE::GuestHelpers::get_pool_usage($user_cfg->{pools}, $usage, $poolid, $skip);
^ This is already inside PVE::GuestHelpers ;-)
> + check_pool_limits($usage->{$poolid}, $limits, 0, $changes);
> + }
> +}
> +
> 1;
> --
> 2.39.2
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list