[pve-devel] [PATCH v2 pve-manager 2/2] ui: qemu : memoryedit: add new max && virtio fields
Fiona Ebner
f.ebner at proxmox.com
Mon Sep 4 13:48:11 CEST 2023
Am 04.09.23 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht:
> Am 02/09/2023 um 08:18 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre:
>> Le vendredi 01 septembre 2023 à 12:24 +0200, Fiona Ebner a écrit :
>>> Am 01.09.23 um 11:48 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht:
>>>> Am 19/06/2023 um 09:28 schrieb Alexandre Derumier:
>>>>> + xtype: 'pveMemoryField',
>>>>> + name: 'max',
>>>>> + minValue: 65536,
>>>>> + maxValue: 4194304,
>>>>> + value: '',
>>>>> + step: 65536,
>>>>> + fieldLabel: gettext('Maximum memory') + ' (MiB)',
>>>> This huge step size will be confusing to users, there should be a
>>>> way to have
>>>> smaller steps (e.g., 1 GiB or even 128 MiB).
>>>>
>>>> As even nowadays, with a huge amount of installed memory on a lot
>>>> of servers,
>>>> deciding that a (potentially bad actor) VM can use up 64G or 128G
>>>> is still
>>>> quite the difference on a lot of setups. Fiona is checking the
>>>> backend here
>>>> to see if it might be done with a finer granularity, or what other
>>>> options
>>>> we have here.
>>>>
>> I was not think about max size as a security feature, but more to
>> define the min dimm size to reach this max value.
>
> Hmm, then I'd might it easier to understand if this is named "DIMM Size"
> or "Minimal DIMM-Size", for the UI we could show the resulting max-memory
> that one can achieve with each DIMM-Size selected.
>
> The range could be from 128 MB to 64 GB (or higher?), and yeah if we have
> an actual maximum we could also auto-calculate it, if not set explicitly
> by the user.
>
> But, I'm currently not to deep into this topic, so take my suggestions
> with a grain of salt.
The advantage with 'max' is that it can be used for both, hotplug with
dimms and virtio-mem. Otherwise, we'd need two different sub-options
depending on hotplug method.
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list