[pve-devel] [PATCH storage] fix #5008: prevent adding pbs storage with invalid namespace

Thomas Lamprecht t.lamprecht at proxmox.com
Wed Nov 15 11:09:24 CET 2023


Am 15/11/2023 um 11:05 schrieb Philipp Hufnagl:
> 
> 
> On 11/15/23 10:52, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> Am 15/11/2023 um 10:37 schrieb Philipp Hufnagl:
>>> On 11/15/23 09:31, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>>>> Am 14.11.23 um 15:27 schrieb Philipp Hufnagl:
>>>>> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm
>>>>> index 4320974..aceb2c4 100644
>>>>> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm
>>>>> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm
>>>>> @@ -817,6 +817,17 @@ sub scan_datastores {
>>>>>      return $response;
>>>>>  }
>>>>>  
>>>>> +sub scan_namespaces {
>>>>> +    my ($scfg, $datastore, $password) = @_;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    my $conn = pbs_api_connect($scfg, $password);
>>>>
>>>> Not super important, but would be nice to have a way to re-use the same
>>>> connection in scan_datastores() and here, since activate_storage() will
>>>> call both of them.
>>>
>>> scan_datastores() seem to be called somewhere else as well. I see if I
>>> can find a way to reuse the connection but not break the code there.
>>
>>
>> In the long run it maybe could be better to have an explicit check_availability
>> hook, but IMO it's a bit late in the release cycle for that as this needs a bit
>> extra care, especially w.r.t. external plugins and our ABI compat.
>>
>> Anyhow, as workaround we might be able to do this check in the on_add_hook and
>> on_update_hook methods for now.
> 
> I am planning on introducing a function called "connect_if_none" that
> checks if it gets passed a connection and if so, return it. If it gets
> passed undef, it will establish a connection and return that one.
> 
> That way a user can simply write something like
> 
>   my $conn = connect_if_none($scfg, $password, $conn);
> 
> and not worry about it.


not sure how above fits to my comment at all...
Connection re-use is not the real issue here, doing it senslessy on every
activate is..

And connect_if_none is a rather generic/undescriptive name and still would
not solve re-use if done in different method calls, so a rather for only
a very limited use case where one can just pass $conn around directly.





More information about the pve-devel mailing list