[pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common 1/1] vzdump: schema: add 'notes' and 'protected' properties

[Fabian Ebner]

Am 16.12.21 um 13:12 schrieb Fabian Ebner:
> In command_line(), notes are printed, quoted, but otherwise as is,
> which is a bit ugly for multi-line notes. But it is part of the
> commandline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner at proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/VZDump/Common.pm | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/PVE/VZDump/Common.pm b/src/PVE/VZDump/Common.pm
> index 83d7413..5bb35ec 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/VZDump/Common.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/VZDump/Common.pm
> @@ -233,7 +233,19 @@ my $confdesc = {
>  	type => 'string',
>  	description => 'Backup all known guest systems included in the specified pool.',
>  	optional => 1,
> -    }
> +    },
> +    notes => {
> +	type => 'string',
> +	description => "Notes to add to the backup(s).",
> +	requires => 'storage',
> +	optional => 1,
> +    },

Quoting off-list discussion here, where it belongs and so we don't
forget about it ;)

With regard to fixing https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438
after all those years.

Fabian G.:
we could offer something like a simple template system that allows
substitution of certain variables (like name, or source node
hostname/clustername, ..). or just a boolean switch for setting VM/CT
$HOSTNAME from $CLUSTER/$NODENAME (or an enum, with
[job-comment,hostname,long,none] where long is that, and hostname is
just the guest hostname, and job-comment is the comment of the vzdump
job if one is set)

Me:
The template variant would be the most flexible one and would avoid the
need for a second vzdump option besides --notes. Ideally, support for it
would be there from the beginning though, as otherwise it will stop
working for a user wanting to literally set $HOSTNAME when we add it ;)
The downside is that it doesn't match the volume-level --notes option,
but I don't think that should be a big deal.

Fabian G.:
well it could just be called notes-template for vzdump to disambiguate?

> +    protected => {
> +	type => 'boolean',
> +	description => "If true, mark backup(s) as protected.",
> +	requires => 'storage',
> +	optional => 1,
> +    },
>  };
>  
>  sub get_confdesc {