[pve-devel] [PATCH v2 common] REST environment: default to root at pam in forked workers if no user was specified

Oguz Bektas o.bektas at proxmox.com
Tue Mar 15 12:21:26 CET 2022


hi,

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 09:57:34AM +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 15.03.22 08:31, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> > Am 14.03.22 um 14:50 schrieb Oguz Bektas:
> >> first call $rpcenv->get_user() if user was 'undef'. if that doesn't
> >> return then we set it to root at pam.
> 
> this is just the "whats done" description, that's not really interesting for
> such a short patch, as it can be read from the code change directly without
> much effort. A sentence about why (original code reason, change reason to the
> new behavior) and impact (what are the call sites that could be affected)
> would be more helpful.

those were all in the v1 patch for pve-container (which had the only call
sites that i could find where user was undefined, namely push_file and
pull_file) but got dropped with the v2 according to fabi's
recommendation. i can send that back if needed :)

> 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas at proxmox.com>
> >> ---
> >> v1->v2:
> >> * do get_user() first, set to 'root at pam' as fallback
> >> * drop first patch for pve-container (not needed anymore)
> >>
> >>  src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm | 7 ++++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm b/src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm
> >> index 1b2af08..bc5b8b5 100644
> >> --- a/src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm
> >> +++ b/src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm
> >> @@ -492,7 +492,12 @@ sub fork_worker {
> >>      $dtype = 'unknown' if !defined ($dtype);
> >>      $id = '' if !defined ($id);
> >>  
> >> -    $user = 'root at pve' if !defined ($user);
> >> +    $user = $self->get_user() if !defined($user);
> > 
> > If you don't set $noerr when calling get_user(), the below if block is
> > dead code.


oops, you're right ^^

> > 
> >> +
> >> +    if (!defined($user)) {
> >> +	warn 'internal error: Worker user was not specified, defaulting to "root at pam"!';
> 
> missing newline at the ends means spamming the log more with internal perl module
> file/line location and I don't really get the warning in the first place, either
> it's OK to fallback or not.
> 
> The REST-env should have a valid user for most (all?) API/CLI-handler derived use
> cases, as only the public API calls have no user set but there we don't use fork_worker
> at all.
> 
> So, I'd examine possible call sites that won't have a user passed nor available via
> get_user(), and dependening from if they even exist I'd
> 
> * check if we could set a sensible user-id, if possible, there already
> * make this either a no-warn or just drop the if-block and avoid passing the $noerr
>   to $self->get_user(), making this a usage error. The latter would be cleaner, but
>   has some theoretic breakage potential. As call-site evaluation should be done in any
>   case, as neither breakage nor defaulting to root at pam is something that should be done
>   "blindly" (I mean, root fallback was probably intended originally, just avoided due
>    to the realm typo, but still).

see the v1 patch for pve-container. i didn't find any other call sites, the
warning was in case we forgot any other call sites somewhere.

defaulting to 'root at pam' in this case actually has no effect but it's
only in the logging for tasks.

i talked to dietmar about this off-list before sending the v1, since
this bit of code was originally imported from the svn repositories way
back, and he told me that it was intended for the log.





More information about the pve-devel mailing list