[pve-devel] [PATCH manager] fix: make 'ceph-volume' conditional on quincy install

[Stefan Sterz]

On 7/4/22 17:25, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> With pve-manager 7.2-6, installing pacific will fail very qickly, as
> the package 'ceph-volume' cannot be found.
> 
> Tested this patch by installing pacific and quincy.
> 
> One comment inline
> 
> Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer at proxmox.com>
> 
> On 7/4/22 17:05, Stefan Sterz wrote:
>> when installing non-quincy versions, 'ceph-volume' is not contained in
>> the respective repositories and, thus, the install process would fail.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Sterz <s.sterz at proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> tested this by installing ceph pacific and quincy, but my setup wasn't
>> really clean so i ran into some unrelated issues.
>>
>>   PVE/CLI/pveceph.pm | 5 ++++-
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/CLI/pveceph.pm b/PVE/CLI/pveceph.pm
>> index a85df130..8e6c8667 100755
>> --- a/PVE/CLI/pveceph.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/CLI/pveceph.pm
>> @@ -176,13 +176,16 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>>       my @ceph_packages = qw(
>>           ceph
>>           ceph-common
>> -        ceph-volume
>>           ceph-mds
>>           ceph-fuse
>>           gdisk
>>           nvme-cli
>>       );
>>   +    if ($cephver eq 'quincy') {
> Wouldn't it be better to check if we are not installing octopus &
> pacific? Then it will work for any newer Ceph version as well. Once we
> do not support octopus and pacific anymore, we can add 'ceph-volume'
> unconditionally to the list of packages to install.
> 

yeah that sounds sensible, give me a minute :)

>> +        push @ceph_packages, 'ceph-volume';
>> +    }
>> +
>>       print "start installation\n";
>>         # this flag helps to determine when apt is actually done
>> installing (vs. partial extracing)