[pve-devel] corosync bug: cluster break after 1 node clean shutdown

[Alexandre DERUMIER]

>>https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cluster-die-after-adding-the-39th-node-proxmox-is-not-stable.75506/#post-336111 
>>
>>No HA involved... 

I had already help this user some week ago

https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-6-2-4-cluster-die-node-auto-reboot-need-help.74643/#post-333093

HA was actived at this time. (Maybe the watchdog was still running, I'm not sure if you disable HA from all vms if LRM disable the watchdog ?)


----- Mail original -----
De: "dietmar" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
À: "aderumier" <aderumier at odiso.com>
Cc: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel at lists.proxmox.com>
Envoyé: Lundi 7 Septembre 2020 10:18:42
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] corosync bug: cluster break after 1 node clean shutdown

There is a similar report in the forum: 

https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cluster-die-after-adding-the-39th-node-proxmox-is-not-stable.75506/#post-336111 

No HA involved... 


> On 09/07/2020 9:19 AM Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier at odiso.com> wrote: 
> 
> 
> >>Indeed, this should not happen. Do you use a spearate network for corosync? 
> 
> No, I use 2x40GB lacp link. 
> 
> >>was there high traffic on the network? 
> 
> but I'm far from saturated them. (in pps or througput), (I'm around 3-4gbps) 
> 
> 
> The cluster is 14 nodes, with around 1000vms (with ha enabled on all vms) 
> 
> 
> From my understanding, watchdog-mux was still runing as the watchdog have reset only after 1min and not 10s, 
> so it's like the lrm was blocked and not sending watchdog timer reset to watchdog-mux. 
> 
> 
> I'll do tests with softdog + soft_noboot=1, so if that happen again,I'll able to debug. 
> 
> 
> 
> >>What kind of maintenance was the reason for the shutdown? 
> 
> ram upgrade. (the server was running ok before shutdown, no hardware problem) 
> (I just shutdown the server, and don't have started it yet when problem occur) 
> 
> 
> 
> >>Do you use the default corosync timeout values, or do you have a special setup? 
> 
> 
> no special tuning, default values. (I don't have any retransmit since months in the logs) 
> 
> >>Can you please post the full corosync config? 
> 
> (I have verified, the running version was corosync was 3.0.3 with libknet 1.15) 
> 
> 
> here the config: 
> 
> " 
> logging { 
> debug: off 
> to_syslog: yes 
> } 
> 
> nodelist { 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm1 
> nodeid: 1 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm1 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm10 
> nodeid: 10 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm10 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm11 
> nodeid: 11 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm11 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm12 
> nodeid: 12 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm12 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm13 
> nodeid: 13 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm13 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm14 
> nodeid: 14 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm14 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm2 
> nodeid: 2 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm2 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm3 
> nodeid: 3 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm3 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm4 
> nodeid: 4 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm4 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm5 
> nodeid: 5 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm5 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm6 
> nodeid: 6 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm6 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm7 
> nodeid: 7 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm7 
> } 
> 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm8 
> nodeid: 8 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm8 
> } 
> node { 
> name: m6kvm9 
> nodeid: 9 
> quorum_votes: 1 
> ring0_addr: m6kvm9 
> } 
> } 
> 
> quorum { 
> provider: corosync_votequorum 
> } 
> 
> totem { 
> cluster_name: m6kvm 
> config_version: 19 
> interface { 
> bindnetaddr: 10.3.94.89 
> ringnumber: 0 
> } 
> ip_version: ipv4 
> secauth: on 
> transport: knet 
> version: 2 
> } 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original ----- 
> De: "dietmar" <dietmar at proxmox.com> 
> À: "aderumier" <aderumier at odiso.com>, "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel at lists.proxmox.com> 
> Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com> 
> Envoyé: Dimanche 6 Septembre 2020 14:14:06 
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] corosync bug: cluster break after 1 node clean shutdown 
> 
> > Sep 3 10:40:51 m6kvm7 pve-ha-lrm[16140]: loop take too long (87 seconds) 
> > Sep 3 10:40:51 m6kvm7 pve-ha-crm[16196]: loop take too long (92 seconds) 
> 
> Indeed, this should not happen. Do you use a spearate network for corosync? Or 
> was there high traffic on the network? What kind of maintenance was the reason 
> for the shutdown?