[pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 qemu-server] fix #2173: use file_size_info to check existence
Mira Limbeck
m.limbeck at proxmox.com
Thu May 2 10:20:21 CEST 2019
On 4/30/19 3:14 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> initially just wanted to review but to finaly move this forward: applied
> comments still inline, can you please answer the question about the
> second file info call? because I just threw a few followup on top, and
> it would be great to verify that I did not missed anything ;-)
>
> Am 4/30/19 um 2:20 PM schrieb Mira Limbeck:
>> use file_size_info to check for existence of cloudinit disk instead of
>> '-e'. this should solve the problem with rbd where the path returned by
>> PVE::Storage::path is not checkable with '-e'. Any size > 0 is
>> interpreted as the image existing.
> you write any > 0 is seen as exist, but your code does any size != 0,
> try to match this, else it just adds confusion and makes one question
> the proposed solution more..
Ah yes, I assume it to always be either undefined (file does not exist
or other errors) or > 0. That's why I used !$size for the check. Could
be clarified, or the code changed to check for negative sizes as well
(if that makes any sense).
>> Signed-off-by: Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck at proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - switched to file_size_info from list_images as it is by far less
>> heavy on large storages.
> Do you mean in comparison to your previous approach of querying a list
> of all images and grepping through it? I would have then rather something
> like "we queried the size anyway, in the best case (existing image)
> we have zero penalty, and worst case query it twice".
>
> Also it could be useful to state a bit more directly that this is just
> a "qemu-img info" command, maybe in the commit message..
Noted. But what if the implementation of file_size_info changes without
invalidating this use case? Then the commit message would no longer be
correct.
>
>> this was recommended by @Dominik instead of
>> the 'map_volume' solution discussed previously as we don't have to
>> map/unmap manually as qemu-img can work with 'rbd:...' paths.
>>
>> The code still matches on (qcow2|raw) even though it was fixed in
>> PVE/API2/Qemu.pm create_disks (bug 1829). Will fix that together with
>> the restore fix.
>>
>> PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm b/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm
>> index 445c777..bda48f1 100644
>> --- a/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm
>> @@ -31,17 +31,18 @@ sub commit_cloudinit_disk {
>> my $iso_path = PVE::Storage::path($storecfg, $drive->{file});
>> my $scfg = PVE::Storage::storage_config($storecfg, $storeid);
>> my $format = PVE::QemuServer::qemu_img_format($scfg, $volname);
>> - if (! -e $iso_path) {
>> +
>> + my $size = eval { PVE::Storage::file_size_info($iso_path) };
>> + if (!$size) {
>> $volname =~ m/(vm-$vmid-cloudinit(.(qcow2|raw))?)/;
>> my $name = $1;
>> my $d = PVE::Storage::vdisk_alloc($storecfg, $storeid, $vmid, $format, $name, 4 * 1024);
>> + $size = PVE::Storage::file_size_info($iso_path);
> wouldn't it be enough to set to 4 * 1024 (or whatever unit it is)?
> Or is this to ensure we have the correct one if a storage pads/aligns
> it up? Even then the 4MB would be enough for us here to pass to
> qemu-img dd?
>
> btw: isn't the $d variable unused here?
Oh yes, sorry about that, with all the rearranging and code changes I
somehow missed the $d variable.
Yes, setting it to 4MiB should be enough here (4 * 1024 * 1024
hopefully, not just 4 * 1024?), as the generated iso image should always
be < our disk image (file_get_contents limit set for custom config
files). The second file_size_info is unneccesary then.
>
> (I followed up with commits doing that, IMO we're actually on the safer
> side using the 4MB for new disks, as the storage always can give us
> something bigger than requested, but not smaller, and so using 4MB for
> qemu-img dd ensure that a storage type can use more than 4MB (and thus
> it works on one, but not the other, which would give a strange bug
> report ^^)
>
>> }
>>
>> my $plugin = PVE::Storage::Plugin->lookup($scfg->{type});
>> $plugin->activate_volume($storeid, $scfg, $volname);
>>
>> - my $size = PVE::Storage::file_size_info($iso_path);
>> -
>> eval {
>> run_command([['genisoimage', '-R', '-V', $label, $path],
>> ['qemu-img', 'dd', '-n', '-f', 'raw', '-O', $format,
>>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list